Abstracts
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to track the scale and the strategy of European multinational firms related to the internationalization of their R&D. We address two questions: 1. Can we confirm the general view assuming a growing trend in the internationalisation of technology? 2. Does the “home base augmenting” dominant strategy observed in the 1990s still hold? We use a patent data set for a sample of 349 firms and two time periods 1994-1996 and 2003-2005. We find out: 1) the remaining importance of the national technological bases of MNCs, 2) R&D internationalisation is not continuously growing over the period under observation, 3) an emerging trend working to the detriment of the home base augmenting strategy.
Keywords:
- large firm (multinational),
- R&D,
- internationalisation,
- locational strategy
Résumé
L’objet de l’article est de suivre l’évolution de l’échelle et des stratégies des firmes multinationales européennes en matière d’internationalisation de leur R-D. On aborde deux questions : 1. Peut-on confirmer le point de vue généralement accepté d’un trend croissant en termes d’internationalisation de la production technologique ? 2. Est-ce que la stratégie “home base augmenting” dominante dans les années 1990 l’est encore ? On utilise une base de données de brevets comprenant 349 firmes sur deux périodes 1994-1996 and 2003-2005. On trouve : 1) la base technologique nationale des firmes reste importante, 2) l’internationalisation de la R-D n’est pas continument croissante sur la période observée, 3) en termes de stratégie on perçoit une tendance émergeante jouant au détriment de la stratégie « home base augmenting ».
Mots-clés :
- grande firme multinationale,
- R&D,
- internationalisation,
- stratégie de localisation
Resumen
El propósito del artículo es el seguimiento de la evolución de la escala y la estrategia de las multinacionales europeas sobre la internacionalización de la I + D. Nos dirigimos a dos preguntas: 1. Podemos confirmar las predicciones de opinión general sobre una tendencia creciente en la internacionalización de la tecnología? 2. Continua la estrategia « home base augmenting » observada en la década de 1990 siendo la estrategia dominante? Utilizamos un conjunto de datos de patentes de 349 empresas y dos períodos; de 1994-1996 y 2003-2005. Encontramos que: 1) La base tecnológica de las empresas multinacionales continua siendo importante, 2) La internacionalización de la R&D no se desarrolla continuamente durante el periodo observado, 3) una nueva tendencia se desarrolla a expensas de la estrategia « home base augmenting ».
Palabras clave:
- grande multinacional firme,
- I + D,
- internacionalización,
- estrategia de ubicación
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abramovsky Laura, Griffith Rachel, Mcartney Gareth; Miller, Helen (2008). “The location of innovative activity in Europe”, Institute for Fiscal Studies, UK. IFS Working Papers W08/10 (downloaded on 03 december 2013 from http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp0810.pdf).
- d’Agostino, Lorena M., Laursen, Keld; Santangelo, Grazia D. (2013). “The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions”, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 13, n° 1, p. 145-175.
- Almeida, Paul (1996). “Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, Winter special issue, p. 155-165.
- Almeida, P., Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 847–864.
- Ambos, Bjorn (2005). “Foreign direct investment in industrial research and development: A study of German MNCs”, Research Policy, vol. 34, n° 4, p. 395-410.
- Bartlett, Christopher A.; Ghoshal, Sumantra (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass..
- Basu R.R., Banerjee P.M., Sweeny E.G., (2013), Frugal Innovation: Core Competencies to Address Global Sustainability. Journal of Management for Global Sustainability 2 (2013): 63–82.
- Branstetter, Lee G., Fisman, Raymond; Foley, Fritz C. (2006). “Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from US firm-level panel data”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 121, n° 1, p. 321-349.
- De Brentani, U., Kleinschmidt, E. J., Salomo, S. (2010). Success in global new product development: impact of strategy and the behavioral environment of the firm. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 143-160.
- Cantwell, John (1995). “The globalisation of technology: what remains of the product cycle model?”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, n° 1, p. 155-174.
- Cantwell, John; Bellak, Christian (1997). “Small latecomer countries in a globalising environment: constraints and opportunities for catching-up”, Development and International Cooperation, vol. 13, n° 24-25, p. 139-179.
- Dosi, G., (1982). ‘Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinant and direction of technological change’. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.
- Doz, Yves L.; Wilson, Keeley (2012). Managing Global Innovation: Frameworks for Integrating Capabilities Around the World, Watertow, Harvard Business School Press, 272 p.
- Doz, Yves L.; Wilson, Keeley, Veldhoen, Steven, Goldbrunner, Thomas; Altman, Georg (2006). “Innovation: is global the way forward? A joint study by Booz Allen Hamilton and INSEAD”, INSEAD.
- Doz, Y., Santos, J., Williamson, P. (2001). From Global to Metanational: How Companies Win in the Global Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Dunning, John H.; Narula, Rajneesh (1995). “The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States”, International Studies of Management and Organisation, vol. 25, n° 1-2, p. 1-64.
- Dunning, John H. (1997). “The economic theory of the firm as the basis for a ‘core’ theory of international production”, in: I. Islam and W. Shepherd, (Eds), Current issues in international business, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 60-68.
- Dunning, John H.; Lundan, Sarianna M. (2009). “The internationalisation of corporate R&D: A review of the evidence and some policy implications for home Countries”, Research Policy, vol. 26, n° 1-2, p. 13-33.
- Eagar R. et al., (2011), The Future of Innovation Management: the next ten years. Prism 1.
- Florida, Richard; Kenney, Martin (1994). “The globalisation of innovation: the geography of Japanese R&D in the US”, Economic Geography, vol. 70, n° 4, p. 344-369.
- Frost, Tony S. (2001). “The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries innovations”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, n° 2, p. 101-123.
- Gammeltoft, Peter (2006). “Internationalisation of R&D: trends, drivers and managerial challenges”, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, vol. 2, n° 1-2, p. 177-199.
- Geroski P., (2003), The evolution of new markets. Oxford University Press.
- Griliches, Zvi (1990). “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, n° 4, p. 1661-1707.
- Hagedoorn, John; Cloodt, Myriam (2003). “Measuring innovative performance. Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?”, Research Policy, vol. 32, n° 8, pp. 1365-1379.
- Harhoff, D. and G. Thoma (2009), Inventor Location and the Globalization of R&D, 25.05.2009, Conference Advancing the Study of Innovation and Globalization in Organization in Nuremberg. Discussion Paper.
- Hewitt, Gary (1980). “Research and development performed abroad by U.S. manufacturing multinationals”, Kyklos, vol. 33, n° 2, p. 308-327.
- Iammarino, Simona; McCann, Philip (2013). Multinationals and economic geography: location, technology and innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 496 p.
- Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard Report (2008). “From the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies of the European Commission IPTS”, (downloaded on 12 November 2013 from http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard12.html).
- Knight G. A. and Cavusgil S. T., (2004), Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies (2004) 35, 124–141.
- Kuemmerle, Walter (1997). “Building effective R&D capabilities abroad”, Harvard Business Review, March-April, p. 61-70.
- Laurens, Patricia, Le Bas, Christian, Schoen, Antoine, Villard, Lionel; Larédo, Philippe (2015) “The rate and motives of the internationalisation of large firm R&D (1994-2005): Toward a turning point?”, Research Policy, vol. 44, p. 765-776.
- Le Bas, Christian; Sierra, Christophe (2002). “Location versus home country advantages in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies”, Research Policy, vol. 31, n° 4, p. 589-609.
- Moed, Henk F., Glänzel, Wolfgang, Schmoch Ulrich (2004). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 800 p.
- Moncado-Paternò-Castello, Pietro, Vivarelli, Marco; Voigt, Peter (2011). “Drivers and impacts in the globalisation of corporate R&D: an introduction based on the European experience”, Industrial and corporate change, vol. 20, n° 2, p. 585-603.
- Mudambi R., Susan M. Mudambi, Pietro Navarra, (2007), Global Innovation in MNCs: The Effects of Subsidiary Self-Determination and Teamwork. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Volume 24, Issue 5, pages 442–455.
- Narula, Rajneesh; Zanfei, Antonello (2005). “Globalisation of innovation: the role of multinational enterprises”, in: J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery et R.R. Nelson, (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, p. 318-345.
- Patel, Pari; Pavitt, Keith (1991). “Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of “Non-Globalisation””, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 22, n° 1, p. 1-21.
- Patel, Pari; Vega, Modesto (1999). “Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages”, Research Policy, vol. 28, n° 2-3, p. 145-155.
- Patel, Pari (2011). “Location of innovative activities of EU large firms”, SPRU Working Paper Series n° 190, (downloaded on 3 December 2013 from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp190.pdf).
- Piscitello, Lucia (2011). “Strategy, location, and the conceptual metamorphosis of the MNC”, Global Strategy, vol. 1, n° 1-2, p. 127-131.
- Prahalad C. K., (2005), The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Warton Publishing.
- Pro Inno Europe Report, (2007). “The implications of R&D off-shoring on the innovation capacity of EU firms”, Helsinki School of Economics (downloaded on 12 November 2013 from http://www.edocr.com/doc/8/implications-r-d-shoring-innovation-capacity-eu-firms).
- de Rassenfosse, Gaetan; van Pottelsberghe, Bruno (2008). “A policy insight into the R&D patent relationship”, Research Policy, vol. 38, n° 5, p. 779-792.
- de Rassenfosse; Gaetan, Dernis, Hélène, Guellec, Dominique, Picci, Lucio; van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno (2013). “The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity”, Research Policy, vol. 42, n° 3, p. 720-737.
- Radjou N., Prabhu J., et Ahuja S., (2013) L’Innovation jugaad. Redevenons ingénieux! Editions Diateino. 384p.
- Roberts, Edward B. (2001). “Benchmarking global strategic management of technology”, Research Technology Management, vol. 29, n° 1, p. 71-88.
- Ronstadt, Robert C. (1978). “International R&D: the establishment and evolution of research and development abroad by seven US multinationals”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 9, n° 1, p. 7-24.
- Rugman, Alan M. (1981). Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets, New York, Columbia University Press, 179 p.
- Sachwald, Frédérique (2008). “Location choice within global innovation networks: the case of Europe”, Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 33, n° 4, p. 364-378.
- Sanna-Randaccio, Francesca; Veugelers, Reinhilde (2001). “Multinational knowledge spillovers with centralized vs decentralized R&D: a game theoretic approach”, CEPR discussion paper, n° DP3151, (downloaded on 07 November 2013 from http://dev3.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/2/2303/papers/veuglers.pdf).
- Shan, Weijian; Song, Jaeyong (1997). “Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: evidence from the biotechnology industry”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 28, n° 2, p. 237-284.
- UNCTAD (2005). “World Invest Report: Transnational corporations and the internationalisation of R&D”, United Nations, New York and Geneva, (downloaded on 12 November 2013 from http://unctad.org/en/docs/wir2005_en.pdf).
- Van Reenan J. (2011) “Big Ideas. Innovation Policy”. CnetrePiece Autumn. 5 pages
- Vernon, Raymond (1966). “International investment and international trade in the product cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics vol. 80, n° 2, p. 190-207.
- Zeschky M.B, Winterhalter., Gassmann O., (2011), Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets. Research-Technology Management (RTM), 38-45.
- Zeschky M.B, Winterhalter., Gassmann O., (2014), “From Cost to Frugal And Reverse Innovation: Mapping the Field and Implications for Global Competitiveness.