Abstracts
Résumé
L’accélération du processus de globalisation a conduit les firmes multinationales à réviser leurs stratégies de localisation. Les auteurs de cet article montrent que les changements effectués se traduisent par une plus forte dispersion géographique des activités et la fragmentation de la chaîne de valeur. Trois questions clés liées aux décisions de localisation dans un espace mondial élargi sont plus spécifiquement développées : les bénéfices de la co-localisation, les déterminants de la localisation et l’attractivité des territoires.
Mots-clés :
- Globalisation,
- stratégie de localisation,
- firme multinationale,
- chaîne de valeur
Abstract
Accelerated globalisation has led multinational firms to revisit their location strategies. The authors of this article show that these changes have resulted in a greater geographic dispersion of activities and the fragmentation of the value chain. Three key issues are more specifically developed regarding location decisions for an expanded global space: the benefits of co- location, the determinants of location and the attractiveness of territories.
Keywords:
- Globalisation,
- location strategy,
- multinational firm,
- value chain
Resumen
La aceleración del proceso de globalización ha llevado las firmas multinacionales a revisar sus estrategias de localización. Los autores de este artículo muestran que los cambios efectuados originan una mayor dispersión geográfica de las actividades y la fragmentación en la cadena de valores. Tres preguntas claves relacionadas con las decisiones de localización, los determinantes de la localización y la atractividad de los territorios.
Palabras clave:
- Globalización,
- estrategias de localización,
- firma multinacional,
- cadena de valores
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Alcacer, Juan (2006). “Location Choices Across the Value Chain : How Activity and Capability Influence Collocation”, Management Science, Vol. 52, N°10, p. 1457-1471.
- Alcacer, Juan; Chung, Wilbur (2007). “Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers”, Management Science, Vol. 53, N°5, p. 760-776.
- Audretsch, David B.; Feldman, Maryann P. (1996). “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production”, American Economic Review, Vol. 86, N°3, p. 630-640.
- Buckley, Peter J.; Ghauri, Pervez N. (2004), “Globalisation, Economic Geography and the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, N°2, p. 81-98.
- Buckley, Peter J.; Hashai, Niron (2009). “Formalizing Internationalization in the Eclectic Pradigm”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, N°1, p. 58-70.
- Cantwell, John. (1989). Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
- Cantwell, John. (2009), “Location and the multinational enterprise”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, N°1, p 35-41.
- Cantwell, John; Narula, Rajneesh (eds.) (2003). International Business and the Eclectic Paradigm : Developing the OLI Framework, London : Routledge.
- Caves, Richard E. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Chang, Sea-Jin; Park, Sekeun (2005), “Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs’ co-location decisions”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, N°7, p. 595-615.
- Colovic, Ana (2010). “Towards a Better Understanding of Multinational Enterprises’ R&D Location Choices”, dans Farok Contractor; Vikas Kumar; Sumit Kundu; Torben Pedersen (sous la direction de), Global Outsourcing and Offshoring : An Integrated Approach to Theory and Corporate Strategy, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, p. 168-190.
- Colovic, Ana; Mayrhofer, Ulrike (2011). “Optimizing the Location of R&D and Production Activities : Trends in the Automotive Industry”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 19, N°8, p. 1481-1498.
- Dembour, Carole (2008). “Competition for Business Location : A survey”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol. 8, N°2, p. 89-111.
- DiMaggio Paul J.; Powell, Walter W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited : institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, N°2, p. 147-160.
- Dunning, John H. (2009). “Location and the multinational enterprise : John Dunning’s thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, N° 1, p. 20–34.
- Dunning, John H. (1998). “Location and the Multinational Enterprise : A Neglected Factor ?” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 29, N°1, p. 45-66.
- Dunning, John H.; Lundan, Sarianna M. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, 2ème éd., Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
- Flores, Ricardo G., Aguilera, Ruth V. (2007). “Globalization and location choice : an analysis of US multinational firms in 1980 and 2000”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, N°7, p. 1187-1210.
- Ghemawat, Pankaj (2001). “Distance Still Matters. The Hard Reality of Global Expansion”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, N°9, p. 137-147.
- Ghemawat, Pankaj; Hout, Thomas (2008). “Tomorrow’s Global Giants. Not the Usual Suspects”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, N°11, p. 80-88.
- Glasmeier, Amy (1994). “Flexible regions ? The institutional and cultural limits to districts in an era of globalization and technological paradigm shifts”, dans Ash Amin; Nigel Thrift (sous la direction de), Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford : Oxford University Press, p. 118-146.
- Globerman, Steven; Shapiro, Daniel (2003). “Governance Infrastructure and US Foreign Direct Investment”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34, N°1, p. 19-39.
- Grabher, Gernot (1993), “The weakness of strong ties : the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area”, dans Gernot Grabher (sous la direction de), The Embedded Firm : On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks, London : Routledge, p. 255-277.
- Guillén, Mauro F. (2002). “Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion : South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987-1995”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, N°3, p. 509-525.
- Guillén, Mauro F. (2000). “Business groups in emerging economies : A resource-based view”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, N°3, p. 362-380.
- Henisz, Witold J; Delios, Andrew (2001). “Uncertainty, Imitation, and Plant Location : Japanese Multinational Corporations 1990-1996”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, N°3, p. 443-475.
- Hennart, Jean-François (2009). “Down with MNE-centric theories ! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, N°9, p. 1432–1454.
- Le Borgne-Larivière, Marie; Schier, Guillaume (2010). “Le rôle des filiales dans le processus de développement à l’international”, Management International, Vol. 15, N°1, p. 59-72.
- Loree, David; Guisinger, Stephen (1995). “Policy and non-policy determinants of US equity foreign direct investment”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26, N°2, p. 281-299.
- Krugman, Paul. (1991). “Increasing returns and economic geography”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, N°3, p. 483–499.
- Levitt Barbara; March James (1988). “Organizational learning”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14, p. 319–340.
- Marshall, Alfred (1920). Principles of Economics, London : McMillan.
- Mayrhofer, Ulrike (2011) (sous la direction de), Le management des firmes multinationales, Paris : Vuibert.
- Mayrhofer, Ulrike; Urban, Sabine (2011). Management international. Des pratiques en mutation, Paris : Pearson Education.
- Nachum, Lilach; Zaheer, Srilata; Gross, Shulamith (2008), “Does it matter where countries are ? Proximity to Knowledge, Markets and Resources, and MNE location choices”, Management Science, Vol. 54, N° 7, p. 1252-1265.
- Nachum, Lilach; Zaheer, Srilata (2005). “The persistence of distance ? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, N°8, p. 747-767.
- Patel, Pari; Vega, Modesto (1999). “Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology : Location vs. home country advantages”, Research Policy, Vol. 28, N°2/3, p. 145-155.
- Procher, Vivien (2011). “Agglomeration Effects and the Location of FDI : Evidence from French First-Time Movers”, Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 46, N°2, p. 295-312.
- Porter, Michael (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London : Macmillan.
- Porter, Michael (1998). “Clustering and the new economics of competition”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, N°6, p. 77–90.
- Porter, Michael (2000). “Locations, clusters, and company strategy”, dans Gordon Clark; Maryann Feldman; Meric Gertler (sous la direction de), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford : Oxford University Press, p. 253-274.
- Porter, Michael; Stern, Scott (2001). “Innovation : location matters”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 42, N°2, p. 28–36.
- Pouder, Richard; St John, Caron (1996). “Hot Spots and Blind Spots : Geographic Clusters of Firms and Innovation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, N°4, p. 1192-1225.
- Romanelli, Elaine; Khessina, Olga (2005). “Regional Industrial Identity : Cluster Configurations and Economic Development”, Organization Science, Vol. 16, N°4, p. 344-358.
- Rugman, Alan M. (2005). The Regional Multinationals, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- Shaver, J. Myles; Flyer, Frederik (2000). “Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, N°12, p. 1175–1193.
- Sturgeon, Timothy; Van Biesebroek, Johaness; Gerrefi, Gary (2008). “Value chains, networks and clusters : Reframing the global automotive industry”, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 8, N°3, p. 297-321.
- Suchman, Marc C. (1995). “Managing legitimacy : strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of ManagementReview, Vol. 20, N°3, p. 571–610.
- Torrès, Olivier (2004). “The failure of the Californian Mondavi’s implantation in France : entrepreneurship and corporatisme”, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 1, N° 1-2, p. 70-99.
- UNCTAD (2011). World Investment Report. Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development, New York/Geneva : United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.