Research on MOOCs in Major Referred Journals: The Role and Place of Content

Babori, Abdelghani; Zaid, Abdelkarim; Fihri Fassi, Hicham

doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4385

Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Van de Ven, M. (2014). Self- and peer assessment in massive open online courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 119-128.

Google Scholar

Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474.

10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 Google Scholar

Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 120-137. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996

10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996 Google Scholar

Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Rangwala, H. (2018). Needle in a haystack: Identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 118, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002

10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002 Google Scholar

Andersen, R., & Mørch, A. I. (2009, March). Mutual development: A case study in customer- initiated software product development. In International Symposium on End User Development (pp. 31-49). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8_3 Google Scholar

Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234-249. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917703

10.1080/01587919.2014.917703 Google Scholar

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. ( 2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386.

10.1002/pits.20303 Google Scholar

Ashton, S., & Davies, R. S. (2015). Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education, 36(3), 312-334. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733

10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733 Google Scholar

Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 49-60.

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010 Google Scholar

Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V. O., & Lan, W. Y. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61-80. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769

10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769 Google Scholar

Bogdan, R. (2017). Integrating MOOCs in embedded systems blended Courses. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 8(3), 101-107. Retrieved from http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain

Google Scholar

Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 119-147. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080

10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080 Google Scholar

Canbek, N. G., & Hargis, J. (2015). Educational innovation in e-learning: MOOCs and OER movements in Turkey. Glokalde, 1(1), 19-32. Retrieved from http://www.glokalde.com/

Google Scholar

Chen, Y. H., & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.008 Google Scholar

Cisel, M., & Bruillard, É. (2013). Chronique des MOOC. Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 19. Retrieved from http://sticef.univ-lemans.fr/

10.3406/stice.2012.1035 Google Scholar

Cohen, L., & Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). Self-regulated learning and a sense of achievement in MOOCs among high school science and technology students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(2), 68-79.

10.1080/08923647.2016.1155905 Google Scholar

Costley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2017). The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 27-46. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2860

Google Scholar

Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2018). Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education, 125, 327-344. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019

10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019 Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Google Scholar

Delcambre, I. (2013). Contenus d’enseignement et d’apprentissages. In Y. Reuter, C. Cohen-Azria, B. Daunay, and D. Lahanier-Reuter (Eds.), Dictionnaire des concepts fondamentaux des didactiques (pp. 43-48). De Boeck Supérieur. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/dictionnaire-des-concepts-fondamentaux-des-didacti9782804169107.htm

10.3917/dbu.reute.2013.01 Google Scholar

de Lima, M., & Zorrilla, M. E. (2017). Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 40-64. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630

10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630 Google Scholar

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. Upper Saddle River. N.J.: Merrill/Pearson.

Google Scholar

Dysthe, O. (2001). Dialog, samspel og læring [Dialogue, interaction and learning]. Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.

Google Scholar

Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjem20

10.1080/17439884.2013.878352 Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

Google Scholar

Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46-68. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010

10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2010 Google Scholar

Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36(3), 295-311. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736

10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736 Google Scholar

Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2014). Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 35(2), 178-201. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917707

10.1080/01587919.2014.917707 Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.4324/9780203838020

Google Scholar

Fluckiger, C., & Reuter, Y. (2014). Les contenus «informatiques» et leur(s) reconstruction(s) par des élèves de CM2. Etude didactique. Recherches en éducation, 18, 64-78. Retrieved from https://hal.univ-lille3.fr/

Google Scholar

Formanek, M., Wenger, M. C., Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., & Sonam, T. (2017). Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019

10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019 Google Scholar

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-119.

Google Scholar

Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35-41. doi: 10.2307/3033543

Google Scholar

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 Google Scholar

Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 135-176. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954

10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954 Google Scholar

Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004

10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004 Google Scholar

Halasek, K., McCorkle, B., Selfe, C. L., DeWitt, S. L., Delagrange, S., Michaels, J., & Clinnin, K. (2014). A MOOC with a view: How MOOCs encourage us to reexamine pedagogical doxa. In S. D. Krause, & C. Lowe (Eds.). Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses. Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.

Google Scholar

Hartnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted, and situation-dependent. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 20-38. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1030

Google Scholar

Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K-12 levels: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 199-231. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573 Google Scholar

Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353-368. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006

10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006 Google Scholar

Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12235

10.1111/bjet.12235 Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.

Google Scholar

Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157-168. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016

10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016 Google Scholar

Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners' contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83-91.

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019 Google Scholar

Huisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2018). Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 101-110. doi: 0.1111/bjet.12520

10.1111/bjet.12520 Google Scholar

Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102-118. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222

10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222 Google Scholar

Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the massive open online course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73-85. Retrieved from http://www.jofdl.nz/

Google Scholar

Jiang, S., Williams, A. E., Warschauer, M., He, W., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2014). Influence of incentives on performance in a pre-college biology MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 100-112. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858

10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1858 Google Scholar

Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 2-18. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087

10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087 Google Scholar

Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar

Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 264-289. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852

10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852 Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009-2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/

Google Scholar

Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001

10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001 Google Scholar

Kwak, S. (2017). Approaches reflected in academic writing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 139-155. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845

10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845 Google Scholar

Lebeaume, J. (2000). L'éducation technologique. Histoires et méthodes [Technological education. Stories and methods]. Paris: ESF.

Google Scholar

Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 28-41. doi: 10.14742/ajet.3749

10.14742/ajet.3749 Google Scholar

Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35(2), 217-233. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2014.917708

10.1080/01587919.2014.917708 Google Scholar

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003

10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003 Google Scholar

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455 Google Scholar

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearn course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 557-569. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12261

10.1111/bjet.12261 Google Scholar

Marks, R.B., Sibley, S.D., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2005) A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.

Google Scholar

Martinand, J. L. (2012). Éducation au Développement durable et didactiques du curriculum [Education for Sustainable Development and Curriculum Didactics]. In Conférence au XIXe Colloque AFIRSE. Lisbonne: Educagri.

Google Scholar

Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 149-159. doi: http://jolt.merlot.org/

Google Scholar

Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005

10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.005 Google Scholar

Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92-102. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033

10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033 Google Scholar

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101-119. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006

10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006 Google Scholar

Nortvig, A. M., & Christiansen, R. B. (2017). Institutional collaboration on MOOCs in education - A literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 307-316. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3110

10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3110 Google Scholar

Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012. Retrieved from https://www.edinaschools.org/cms/lib/MN01909547/Centricity/Domain/272/The%20Year%20of%20the%20MOOC%20NY%20Times.pdf

Google Scholar

Paton, R. M., Fluck, A. E., & Scanlan, J. D. (2018). Engagement and retention in VET MOOCs and online courses: A systematic review of literature from 2013-2017. Computers & Education, 125, 191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.013

10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.013 Google Scholar

Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students’ patterns of engagement and course performance in a massive open online course. Computers & Education, 95, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015 Google Scholar

Pundak, D., Sabag, N., & Trotskovsky, E. (2014). Accreditation of MOOCs. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 17(2), 117-129. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org

10.2478/eurodl-2014-0023 Google Scholar

Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015). Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 488-509. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12279

10.1111/bjet.12279 Google Scholar

Rieber, L. P. (2017). Participation patterns in a massive open online course (MOOC) about statistics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1295-1304. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12504

10.1111/bjet.12504 Google Scholar

Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91-115. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743

10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743 Google Scholar

Riyami, B., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2016). Towards integrating MOOC in the Moroccan higher educational system: Economic pedagogical model based on ICT for on-going education and teacher motivation. In ICERI 2016. Seville: IATED. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

10.21125/iceri.2016.0572 Google Scholar

Rolfe, V. (2015). A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of massive online open courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18(1), 52-71. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org

10.1515/eurodl-2015-0004 Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Google Scholar

Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6), 1-19. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033

10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033 Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Google Scholar

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm

Google Scholar

Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35-50. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003

10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003 Google Scholar

Simonson, M. R. (1979). Designing instruction for attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(3), 15-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02984375

Google Scholar

Simonson, M., & Maushak, N. (1996). Instructional technology and attitude change. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 984-1016). Mayway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Google Scholar

Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2015). Implementation of Tel Aviv university MOOCs in academic curriculum: A pilot study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 80-97. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2031

10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2031 Google Scholar

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.

Google Scholar

Stich, A. E., & Reeves, T. D. (2017). Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001

10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.09.001 Google Scholar

Stump, G. S., DeBoer, J., Whittinghill, J., & Breslow, L. (2013). Development of a framework to classify MOOC discussion forum posts: Methodology and challenges. Proceedings of NIPS 2013 Workshop on Data Driven Education. Retrieved from http://tll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/library/Coding_a_MOOC_Discussion_Forum.pdf

Google Scholar

Svinicki, M. D. (2010). A guidebook for conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education. Retrieved from http://crlte.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/06/Svinicki-Conceptual-Frameworks.pdf

Google Scholar

Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners’ experiences in MOOCs: Participation in social networks outside of MOOCs, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570-587. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12297

10.1111/bjet.12297 Google Scholar

Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 1-17. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202

10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202 Google Scholar

Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 199-221. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448

10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448 Google Scholar

Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208-223. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400

10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400 Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., & Barbera, E. (2016). Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 683-699. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12433

10.1111/bjet.12433 Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709

10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709 Google Scholar

Wang, Z. J., & Chen, L. (2015). Theory framework building of instructional interaction in connectivist learning context. The Journal of Open Educational Research, 5, 25-34. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709

Google Scholar

Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an animal behavior and welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013

10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013 Google Scholar

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Janakiraman, S., & Richardson, J. (2017). A team of instructors’ use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance strategies: An animal behaviour and welfare MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 69-91. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2663

10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2663 Google Scholar

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 55-74. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379

10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379 Google Scholar

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., & Mueller, C. (2017). Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114, 274-285. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005

10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.005 Google Scholar

Watted, A., & Barak, M. (2018). Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001

10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.001 Google Scholar

Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W., & Vytasek, J. (2017). Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001

10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.001 Google Scholar

Wong, B. T. M. (2016). Factors leading to effective teaching of MOOCs. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 105-118. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.co

Google Scholar

Xu, B., Zhang, Y., Li, F., & Yang, D. (2015). MOOC Ke Cheng Lun Tan Zhong Xue Xi Zhe Lun Tan Jiao Hu Wang Luo Jie Gou Te Zheng Fen Xi [The structural analysis of interactive network formed MOOC discussion forums]. Computer Education, 15, 23-35. doi: 10.16512/j.cnki.jsjjy.2015.15.007

Google Scholar

Yang, Q. (2014). Students motivation in asynchronous online discussions with MOOC mode. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 325-330.

Google Scholar

Yang, H. H., & Su, C. H. (2017). Learner behaviour in a MOOC practice-oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 36-63. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991

10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991 Google Scholar

Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). A review of the state-of-the-art. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Barcelona: SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications.

Google Scholar

Zaid, A (2017). Élaborer, transmettre et construire des contenus scientifiques et technologiques. Perspective didactique des dispositifs d'éducation et de formation [Develop, transmit and build scientific content and technology. Didactic perspective of education and training systems]. Rennes: PUR.

Google Scholar

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs - An explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 243-259. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356

10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356 Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (2016). Can MOOCs be interesting to students? An experimental investigation from regulatory focus perspective. Computers & Education, 95, 340-351. doi: /10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003

10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.003 Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Skryabin, M., & Song, X. (2016). Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA). Distance Education, 37(3), 270-286. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230

10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230 Google Scholar

Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012 Google Scholar

Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002

10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002 Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.

Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Google Scholar

Research on MOOCs in Major Referred JournalsThe Role and Place of Content[Record]

Abstract

Bibliography

Abstracts

Abstract

Appendices

Bibliography

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article