Abstracts
Abstract
Does nonverbal communication exist in asynchronous, text-based online education? It is commonly believed that it does not due to the absence of body language and paralanguage. An examination of the definitions and forms of nonverbal cues suggests the possibility for some of them to be transmitted through asynchronous, text-based online human interactions. To explore the presence, type, and potential impact of electronic nonverbal cues (eNVC), I conducted this research using the Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Method Design. Phase 1 constituted the preliminary, qualitative stage of this research, during which participants completed an online questionnaire to identify what actions, if any, could speak louder than words in discussion-based courses. Thematic analysis of the questionnaire answers revealed the potential existence and influence of several eNVC categories. Phase 2 constituted the quantitative stage, and served to validate Phase 1 findings through the data collection and analysis of two versions of an online survey: one for professors and another for learners. The collated research findings confirmed that eNVC exist and communicate messages beyond those sent and received through printed words in the asynchronous, online learning environment. According to study participants, these types of electronic cues contributed to the social and teaching presences, and therefore carried the potential to influence students’ levels of engagement and motivation.
Keywords:
- text-based,
- asynchronous,
- communication,
- electronic nonverbal cues (eNVC),
- social presence,
- teaching presence,
- engagement,
- motivation
Appendices
Bibliography
- Baron, N. S. (2003a). Language of the internet. In A. Farghali (Ed.), The stanford handbook for language engineers (pp. 59-127). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
- Baron, N. S. (2003b). Why email looks like speech: Proofreading, pedagogy, and public face. In J. Aitchison & D. Lewis (Eds.), New media language (pp. 102-113). London, UK: Routledge.
- Bart, M. (2012). Online student engagement tools and strategies. Madison, WI: Magna Publications.
- Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Blatner, A. (2002, August 1). More about nonverbal communications. Part 2: Using experiential methods of learning. Retrieved from http://www.blatner.com/adam/level2/nverb2.htm
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2010). Chapter 1: Introduction to nonverbal communication, In Nonverbal communication (pp. 1-28). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Creative Commons. (2012). Chapter 4: Types of nonverbal communication. In A primer on communication studies (Vol.1.0, pp. 196-235). Retrieved from http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/a-primer-on-communication-studies/
- Creswell, J. W. (2013, February 19). What is mixed methods research? University of Nebraska-Lincoln [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OaNiTlpyX8
- Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Online educators' recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action. Open Praxis, 10(1), 79-89. doi: 10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.721
- Fisher, B. A., & Adams, K. L. (1994). Interpersonal communication: Pragmatics of human relationships. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/coi_site/documents/Garrison_Anderson_Archer_Critical_Inquiry_model.pdf
- Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157-72. Retrieved from https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1096751607000358/1-s2.0-S1096751607000358-main.pdf?_tid=a959f42c-38a6-4c45-90d5-09c2a6f2c639&acdnat=1549252130_048d2626462915d529dc7c20a1386a35
- Keating, C. F. (2016). The developmental arc of nonverbal communication: Capacity and consequence for human social bonds. In D. Matsumoto, H. C. Hwang, & M. G. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 103-138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14669-005
- Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Chapter 1: Nonverbal communication: Basic Perspectives. In Nonverbal communication in human interaction (7th ed., pp. 1-25). Boston, MA: Wodsworth Cengage Learning. Retrieved from https://www.cengagebrain.com.mx/content/knapp68694_0495568694_02.01_chapter01.pdf
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-93. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2025
- Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (Eds.). (2009). Nonverbal communication theories. In Encyclopedia of communication theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Liu, S., Gomez, J., Khan, B., & Yen, C. (2007). Toward learning oriented community college online course dropout framework. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(4), 519-542. Waynesville, NC USA. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21789/.
- Manusov, V. (2016). A history of research on nonverbal communication: Our divergent pasts and their contemporary legacies. In D. Matsumoto, H. C. Hwang, & M. G. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 3-15). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14669-001
- Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C. (2016). The cultural bases of nonverbal communication. In D. Matsumoto, H. C. Hwang, & M. G. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 77-101). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14669-004
- Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Menchaca, M.P., & Bekele, T.A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231-252. doi: 10.1080/01587910802395771
- Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurr, J. (2010). The future of higher education: Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mX7kiLWp8hkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=The+Future+of+Higher+Education:+Rhetoric,+Reality,+and+the+Risks+of+the+Market &ots=0EJ2Dyhu1Y&sig=RACLZVjYO9aHn8zzTgtl-j4rpYs
- Reilly, J. R., Gallagher-Lepak, S., & Killion, C. (2012). 'Me and my computer': Emotional factors in online learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(2), 100-105. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.100
- Schramm, W. (1955). How communication works. In W. Schramm (Ed.). The process and effects of mass communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423. Retrieved from: http://math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf
- Tri-Council Policy Statement. (2014). Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
- Watzlawick, P., Beavin Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.