Abstracts
Abstract
The West Don Lands played an important role in Toronto’s history, primarily as an industrial centre from the mid-19th century to the mid-20th century. Therefore, the negative impacts of de-industrialization on the precinct can hardly be considered surprising. However, efforts are being made to revitalize the West Don Lands and redress the decay experienced by the precinct. This paper examines these efforts, detailed in the Waterfront Toronto’s Precinct and Block Plans, with particular focus being placed on the role that urban forestry can play on the creation of physical and social linkages.
Keywords:
- urban forest,
- sustainable development,
- West Don Lands,
- revitalization,
- linkages
Résumé
Les West Don Lands ont joué un rôle de premier plan dans l’histoire de Toronto. Du milieu du dix-neuvième siècle jusqu’au milieu du vingtième siècle cette zone est connue comme centre industriel. Aujourd’hui, force est de constater que le quartier subit les conséquences négatives de la désindustrialisation. Des travaux sont en cours pour revitalisation les West Don Lands et freiner la dégradation de ce milieu. L’étude se penche sur les initiatives proposées par la Société de revitalisation du secteur riverain de Toronto dans son plan de réaménagement, en mettant l’accent sur le rôle de la dans la création de liens physiques et sociaux.
Mots-clés:
- foresterie urbaine,
- West Don Lands,
- revitalisation,
- liens
Appendices
Bibliographie
- City of Toronto (2007a). Don River. http://www.toronto.ca/don/watershed.htm. Accessed: May 30, 2007.
- City of Toronto (2007b). Toronto Mayor David Miller unveils dynamic climate change Initiative, Press Release: May 15, 2007. http://wx.toronto.ca/inter/it/newsrel.nsf/thismonth?OpenView. Accessed, May 30, 2007.
- City of Toronto (2007c). Wetlands are the best lands. http://www.toronto.ca/don/wetlands.htm. Accessed: May 30, 2007.
- City of Toronto (2006). Toronto Official Plan. June 2006: City of Toronto. http://www.toronto.ca/planning/official_plan/pdf_chapter1-5/chapter1-5_searchable_locked.pdf. Accessed: May 21, 2007.
- Coles, R.W. and S.C. Bussey (2000). “Urban forest landscapes in the UK-progressing the social Agenda”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 52, p. 181-188.
- Cornelis, J. and M. Hermy (2004). “Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders”. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 69, p. 385-401.
- De Ridder, K., V. Adamec, A. Bañuelos, M. Bruse, M. Bürger, O. Damsgaard, J. Dufek, J. Hirsch, F. Lefebre, J.M. Pérez-Lacorzana, A. Thierry, and C. Weber (2004). “An integrated methodology to assess the benefits of urban green space”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 334-335, p. 489-497.
- De Sousa, C.A., (2003). “Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 62, p. 181-198.
- Desfor, G. and R. Keil (2000). “Every River Tells a Story: The Don River (Toronto) and the Los Angeles River (Los Angeles) as articulating landscapes”, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 2, p. 5-23.
- Donald, B.J., (1997). “Fostering volunteerism in an environmental stewardship group: A report on the Task Force to Bring Back the Don, Toronto, Canada”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 40, p. 483-505.
- DMTI Spatial Inc. (2005). CanMap RouteLogistics 2005.3 – (CMA Toronto Clip). Markham, Ontario: DMTI Spatial Inc. https://www.runner.ryerson.ca/madar/geospatial/libdata/action2b.cfm?ResourceID=170. Accessed: July 2, 2008.
- Foster, J. (2005). “Restoration of the Don Valley Brick Works: Whose restoration? Whose space?”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 10, p. 331-351.
- Germann-Chiari, C. and K. Seeland (2004). “Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research”, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 6, p. 3-13.
- Gorrie, P. (2007), February 17. “Toronto’s green blueprint”. Toronto Star (online content). http://www.thestar.com/News/article/182867. Accessed: May 17, 2007.
- Guirado, M. J. Pino, and F. Rodà (2006). “Understorey plant species richness and composition in metropolitan archipelagos: effects of forest size, adjacent land use and distance to the edge”, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Vol. 15, p. 50-62.
- Heynen, N., H.A. Perkins, and P. Roy (2006). “The political ecology of uneven green space: The impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee”, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 42, p. 3-25.
- Hull IV, R.B., M. Lam, and G. Vigo (1994). “Place identity: symbols of self in the urban fabric”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 28, p. 109-120.
- Hunter, I.R., (2001). “What do people want from urban forestry?-The European experience”, Urban Ecosystems, Vol. 5, p. 277-284.
- Jim, C.Y. (1999). “A planning strategy to augment the diversity and biomas of roadside trees in urban Hong Kong”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 42, p. 13-32.
- Jim, C.Y. (2004). “Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities”, Cities, Vol. 21, p. 311-320.
- Johnston, M. (1996). “A brief history of urban forestry in the United States”, Arboricultural Journal, Vol. 20, p. 257-278.
- Jorgensen, E. (1986). “Urban foresty in the rearview mirror”, Arboricultural Journal, Vol. 10, p. 177-190.
- Keil, R. and G. Desfor (2003). Ecological modernisation in Los Angeles and Toronto”, Local Environment, Vol. 8, p. 27-44.
- Konijnendijk, C.C. (2003). “A decade of urban forestry in Europe”, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 5, p. 173-186.
- Norcliffe, G.B. (1996). “Canadian urban landscape examples-16: Mapping deindustrialization: Brian Kipping’s landscapes of Toronto”, Canadian Geographer, vol. 40, p. 266-272.
- Pirnat, J. (2000). “Conservation and management of forest patches and corridors in suburban landscapes”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 52, p. 135-143.
- Solecki, W.D. and J.M. Welch (1995). Urban parks: green spaces or green walls?”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 32, p. 93-106.
- Thompson, C.W. (2002). “Urban open space in the 21st century”, Landscape and Urban Planning”, Vol. 59, p. 59-72.
- Treiman, T. and J. Gartner (2006). “Are residents willing to pay for their community forests? Results of a contingent valuation survey in Missouri, USA”, Urban Studies, Vol. 43, p. 1537-1547.
- Waterfront Toronto (No date). West Don Lands backgrounder. http://twrctest.webhandcentral.com/dbdocs//447b5c381a5de.pdf. Accessed: May 15, 2007.
- Tyrväinen, L., K. Mäkinen, and J. Schipperijn (2007). “Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 79, p. 5-19.
- Urban Design Associates (2006). West Don Lands Block Plan and Design Guidelines, May 2006, Toronto, Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation.
- Urban Design Associates (2005). West Don Lands Precinct Plan, May 2005, Toronto, Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation.
- USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2006). International brownfield case study: Waterfront regeneration trust, Toronto, http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/partners/toronto.html. Accessed: June 1, 2007.
- Van Herzele, A. (2006). “A forest for each city and town: Story lines in the policy debate for urban forests in Flanders”, Urban Studies, Vol. 43, p. 673-696.
- Welch, J.M. (1994). “Street and park trees of Boston: a comparison of urban forest structure”, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 29, p. 131-143.