Abstracts
Résumé
Dans cet article, la mobilité quotidienne des enfants constitue un analyseur singulier du mode de vie des familles et en particulier celles ayant fait le choix de s’installer en banlieue, dans une ville nouvelle de la région parisienne. A partir de données quantitatives et qualitatives mettant en regard, dans deux contextes urbains (centre de Paris et banlieue parisienne), le discours des enfants et celui des parents, nous montrons l’incidence des logiques résidentielles et de la structure urbaine des quartiers sur les conditions d’autonomie de déplacements. En ville nouvelle, l’autonomie des enfants tend à se construire dans une logique de territoires inscrite dans un besoin de fixité, de sociabilité et de visibilité tandis qu’en centre-ville, c’est la logique de cheminement qui prévaut.
Mots-clés:
- Autonomie de déplacements,
- sécurité,
- socialisation,
- enfants,
- ville,
- banlieue
Abstract
In the present paper, the daily mobility of children is seen as a unique analyzer of family life styles, more especially as concerns those families that have opted to reside in the suburbs, in one of the new towns in the area of Paris .Using both quantitative and qualitative data for purposes of comparing, within two urban contexts (central Paris and the Paris suburbs), the discourse of the children and that of their parents, we show the effect of residential logic and of the urban structures of neighbourhoods on the conditions of independent travel. In the new town, the child's autonomy tends to develop according to a territorial logic that reflects a need for set limits, sociability and visibility, whereas downtown it is the logic of trajectory that prevails.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Abu Ghazzeh, T. M. (1998), “Children’s use of the street as a playground in Abu-Nuseir, Jordan”, Environment and Behavior, 30, 6, p.799-831.
- Anderson, J. & Tindall, M. (1972), The concept of home range: new data for the study of territorial behaviour, in W.J. Mitchell (Ed.), Environmental Design : research and practice, Los Angeles, University of California.
- Appleyard, D. & Lintell, M. (1972), “The environmental quality of city streets: the resident viewpoint”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38, p. 84-101.
- Barker, R.G. & Wright, H.F. (1955), Midwest and its children: the psychological Ecology of an American town, Evantson, Row, Peterson and company, 532 p.
- Bartlett, S. (1998), “Does inadequate housing perpetuate children’s poverty?”, Childhood, 5, p. 403-420.
- Bassand, M. (1995), « L’enfant et la dynamique urbaine : approche sociologique », Architecture et comportements, 11, 1, p. 43-54.
- Berg, M. & Medrich, E.A. (1980), “Children in four neighborhoods: The physical environment and its effect on play and play patterns”, Environment and Behavior, 12, 3, p. 320-348.
- Berger, M. (2006), « Périurbanisation et accentuation des logiques ségrégatives en Île-de-France », Hérodote, n°122, La Découverte, 3ème trimestre, p.198-211.
- Bertaux-Wiame, I. & Gotman, A. (1993), « Le changement de statut résidentiel comme expérience familiale », In C. Bonvalet & A Gotman (Eds.) Le logement, une affaire de famille (pp. 129-167), Paris, Editions l’Harmattan, 167 p.
- Blakely, K.S. (1994), Parents' conceptions of social dangers to children in the urban environment. Children's Environments, 11, 1, p. 16-25.
- Bonvalet, C., Brun, J. & Segaud, M. (2000), Logement et habitat. La documentation française. N° septembre.
- Bonvalet, C. & Gotman, A. (1993), Le logement, une affaire de famille, Paris, l’Harmattan, 167 p.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977), “Toward an experimental ecology of human development”. American Psychologist, July, p. 513-531.
- Bowlby, J. (1973), Attachment and Loss (vol. 2. Separation: Anger and anxiety), London, The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, 504 p.
- Björklid, P. (1994), “Children- traffic-environment. Special Issue: Children and the city”, Architecture and behavior, 10, 4, p.399-405.
- Chawla, L. (1992), “Childhood place attachments”, Human Behavior and Environment:Advances in Theory and Research, 12, p. 63-86.
- Chombart de Lauwe, M.J. (1987), Espaces d’enfants : la relation enfants-environnement, ses conflits. (sous la dir), Fribourg, Del Val, 299 p.
- Demetre, J.D & Gaffin, S. (1994), “The salience of occluding vehicles to child pedestrians”, Bristish Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, p. 243-251.
- Depeau, S. (2005), « Sur le trajet de l’école ou l’apprentissage de l’autonomie : une transition à plusieurs dimensions », in M. Robin & E. Ratiu (Eds.) Transitions et rapports à l’espace (pp.189-212). Paris, L’harmattan : Logiques sociales, 300 p.
- Dowling, R. (2000), « Cultures of mothering and car use in suburban Sydney: a preliminary investigation », Geoforum, 31, p. 345-353.
- Dupuy, G. (2000), « Automobilités : quelles relations à l’espace », in M. Bonnet & D. Desjeux (Eds), Les territoires de la mobilité (pp.37-51), Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 224 p.
- Fuhrer, U. (1998), « Behavior as vehicles of children’s cultivation », in D. Görlitz, H.J. Harloff, G. Mey & J. Valsiner (Eds), Children, Cities and Psychological Theories : Developing Relationships (pp. 411-434), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co, 688 p.
- Gärling, A. & Gärling, T. (1990), “Parents' residential satisfaction and perceptions of children's accident risk”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 1, p. 27-36.
- D. Görlitz, D., H.J. Harloff, H.J., Mey, G. & Valsiner, J. (1998), Children, Cities and Psychological Theories : Developing Relationships, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co, 688 p.
- Gump & Adelberg (1978), “Urbanism from the perspective of ecological psychologists”, Environment and Behavior, 10, p. 171-179.
- Hart, R. (1979), Children’s experience of place, New-York, Irvington, 544 p.
- Haumont, N. & Raymond, H. (1966), L’habitat pavillonnaire, Paris, CRU, (réédition l’Harmattan 2000), Les pavillonnaires, Paris, CRU, 150 p.
- Heine, W.D. & Guski, R. (1998), “Street traffic, children, and the extended concept of affordance as a mean of shaping the environment”, in D. Görlitz, H.J. Harloff, G. Mey & J. Valsiner (Eds) Children, Cities and Psychological Theories : Developing Relationships (pp. 514-542), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co, 688 p.
- Heurlin-Norinder, M. (1996), “Children, environment and independant mobility”, Paper presented at IAPS 14, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Hillman, M., Adams, J. & Whitelegg, J. (1997), “One False Move...A Study of children's independant mobility”, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 187 p.
- Joshi, M.S. Mac Lean, M., Carter, W. (1999), “Children's journey to school: Spatial skills, knowledge and perceptions of the environment”, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 1, p. 125-139.
- Juan, S., Largo-Poirier, A., Orain, H. & Poltorak, J.-F. (1997), Les sentiers du quotidien : rigidité, fluidité des espaces sociaux et trajets routiniers en ville, Paris, L’Harmattan, 204 p.
- Jutras, S. & Lepage, G. (2006), “Parental perceptions of contributions of school and neighbourhood to children’s psychological wellness”, Journal of community Psychology, 34, 3, p. 305-325.
- Kyttä, M. (1997), “Children’s independent mobility in urban, small town and rural environments”, in Camstra (Ed.), Growing up in a changing urban landscape, Assen, Van Gorcum, 196 p.
- Kyttä, M., (2002), “Affordances of children’s environments in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus”, Journal of environmental Psychology, 11, p. 109-123.
- Kaufmann, V. & Flamm, M. (2002), Famille, temps et mobilité. Etat de l’art et tour d’horizon des innovations, Rapport de recherche CNAF et Ville en mouvement.
- Kaufmann, V & Widmer, E. (2005), « L’acquisition de la motilité au sein des familles. Etat de la question et hypothèses de recherché”, Espaces et sociétés, 120-121, 1-2, p. 199-217.
- Lam, L.T. (2001), “Parental risk perceptions of childhood pedestrian road safety”, Journal of safety research, 32, p. 465-478.
- Lee, T. & Row, T. (1994), “Parents' and children's perceived risks of the journey to school. Special Issue: Children and the city”, Architecture and Behaviour, 10, 4, p. 379-389.
- Lindberg, E., Hartig, T., Garvill, J. & Gärling, T. (1992), “ Residential-location preferences across life-span”, Journal of environmental Psychology, 12, p. 187-198.
- Lynch, K. (1977), Growing up in cities : studies of the spatial environment of adolescence in Cracow, Melbourne, Mexico city, Salta, Toluca and Warsaw, Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press, 177 p.
- Matthews, M.H. (1987), “Gender, home-range and environmental cognition”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New series, 12, p.43-56.
- Mc Millan, T.E. (2007), “The relative influence of urban forme on a child’s travel mode to school”, Transportation Research Part A, 41, p. 69-79.
- Merlin, P. (1997), Les Villes Nouvelles en France, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, coll. “Que sais-je?”, 2ème édition, 127 p.
- Moore, G.T. (1985), “State of the art in play environment”, in J.L. Frost & S. Sunderlin (Eds.), When children play (pp. 171-192), Wheaton, MD, Association for Childhood Education International, 355 p.
- Moser, G. (1992), Les stress urbains, Paris, Armand Colin.193 p.
- Nasar, J.L. (2000), “The Evaluative Image of Places”, in W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik & R. H. Price (Eds.) Person-Environment Psychology. New Directions and Perspectives (pp.117-168), London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 360 p.
- Nucci, L. & Smetana, J.G. (1996), “Mothers’ concepts of young children’s areas of personal freedom”, Child development, 67, p. 1870-1886.
- O’Brien, M., Jones, D. & Sloan, D. (2000), “Children’s independant spatial mobility in the urban public realm”, Childhood, 7, 3, p. 257-277.
- Plas, J. & Lewis, S. (1996), “Environmental factors and sense of community in planned town”, American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, p. 109-143.
- Pouyanne, G. (2004), Forme urbaine et mobilité quotidienne, Thèse de 3ème cycle en Sciences économiques, Université Bordeaux IV.
- Prezza, M., Pilloni, S., Morabito, C., Sersante, C., Alparone, F.R., Guiliani, M.V. (2001), “The Influence of Psychosocial an Environmental Factors on Children’s Independant Mobility and Relationship to Peer Frequentation”, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11, p. 435-450.
- Rissotto, A. & Tonucci, F. (2002), “Freedom of movement and environmental knowledge in elementary school children”, Journal of environmental Psychology, 22, p. 65-77.
- Robin, M. (2005), « Le rapport à l’espace résidentiel des nouveaux parents de la région parisienne », in M. Robin & E. Ratiu (Eds.), Transitions et rapports à l’espace (pp. 25-46). Paris, L’Harmattan, 300 p.
- Shemyakin, F.N. (1962), “Orientation in space”, in B.G. Annayer (Ed.) Psychological sciences in the ussr, Office and technical, Washington, Services Report, 62.
- Singly, F. de & Decup-Pannier, B. (2000), “Avoir une chambre chez chacun de ses enfants séparés », in F. de Singly (Ed.), Libres ensemble. L’individualisme dans la vie commune (pp. 219-236), Paris, Nathan, 250 p.
- Tsoukala, K. (2001), L’image de la ville chez l’enfant, Paris, Anthropos, 191 p.
- Turiel, E. Hildebrandt, C. & Wainryb, C. (1991), « Judging social issues: difficulties, inconsistencies and consistencies”, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial 224, 56 (2).
- Valentine, G. (1996), “Children should be seen and not heard: the production and transgression of adults’ public space”, Urban Geography, 17, 3, p. 205–220.
- Van Vliet, W. (1983), “Exploring the fourth environment: an examination of the Home-Range of city and suburban Teenagers”, Environment and Behavior, 15, 5, p. 567-588.
- Vygotsky, L. (1931/1978), Mind in Society, Cambridge, M.A, Harvard University Press, 59 p.
- Wohlwill, J.F. & Heft, H. (1987), “The physical environment and the development of the child”, in D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.). Handbook of environmental Psychology (pp.281-328), New-York, John Wiley & Sons, 1684 p.
- Zani, B., Cicognani, E. & Albanesi, C. (2001). Adolescents’ Sense of community and feeling of Unsafety in the Urban Environment. Journal of community and applied Psychology, 11, p. 475-489.