Popular GenAI Chatbots Vary in Capabilities to Answer Academic Reference Questions / Whitfield, S., & Yang, S. Q. (2025). Evaluating AI language models for reference services: A comparative study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2025.2478861⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Shen, Lisa

doi:https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30949

Glynn, L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610692154

10.1108/07378830610692154 Google Scholar

Whitfield, S., & Yang, S. Q. (2025). Evaluating AI language models for reference services: A comparative study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 29(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2025.2478861

10.1080/10875301.2025.2478861 Google Scholar

Yang, S. Q., & Mason, S. (2024). Beyond the algorithm: Understanding how ChatGPT handles complex library queries. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 28(2), 97–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2291441

10.1080/10875301.2023.2291441 Google Scholar

Appendices

Bibliography

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article