ror.org/0161xgx34
Abstracts
Résumé
Les institutions universitaires doivent implanter des mécanismes de suivi en continu de leurs programmes pour s’assurer de leur pertinence et pour répondre à différents besoins d’évaluation. Parmi les outils et les méthodes pouvant leur venir en aide se trouvent les tableaux de bord, pour centraliser et exploiter des indicateurs pertinents à ce suivi, la cartographie de programme, afin d’analyser la cohérence de ceux-ci, ainsi que les plans de cours, comme matière première à ce suivi. Après avoir présenté ces trois éléments, la méthodologie de l’École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information (EBSI) de l’Université de Montréal est présentée pour en illustrer l’application.
Abstract
Universities must implement mechanisms that allow for the continuous evaluation of their programmes in order to ensure their relevance and to meet the different evaluation challenges. Management charts are just one of the tools that can be used to monitor the relevant indicators of the evaluation mechanism and to assess the coherence of the programmes. Curriculum mapping and course outlines can also be used to monitor the indicators. Following a description of these three elements, the methodology used by the École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information (EBSI) of the Université de Montréal is described, illustrating the application of continuous evaluation.
Resumen
Las instituciones universitarias deben implementar mecanismos de seguimiento permanente en sus programas, a fin de garantizar su pertinencia y de responder a las diferentes necesidades de evaluación. Entre las herramientas y los métodos que pueden ser útiles, encontramos los cuadros de mando, que permiten centralizar y explotar indicadores pertinentes a este seguimiento; la cartografía de programas, destinada a analizar su coherencia, y los planes de estudio, como base de este seguimiento. Tras la presentación de estos tres elementos, se introduce la metodología de la Escuela de Bibliotecología y Ciencias de la Información (EBSI) de la Universidad de Montreal para ilustrar su aplicación.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Adams, John D. 2003. Successful change: Paying attention to the intangibles. OD Practitioner 35 (4) : 3-7.10.1002/au.3650080602 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Appleby, Drew C. 1999. How to improve your teaching with the course syllabus. In Lessons Learned: Practical Advice for the Teaching of Psychology, sous la direction de Baron Perlman, Lee I. McCann & Susan H. McFadden. Washington, DC : American Psychological Society, 19-24.10.1007/BF00992834 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bers, Trudy, Diane Davis & William Taylor. 1996. Syllabus analysis: What are we teaching and telling our students? Assessment Update 8 (6) : 1-2, 14-15.10.1002/au.3650080602 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bloom, Benjamin & David R. Krathwohl. 1956-1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain. New York : Longman.10.2307/1179238 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cadix, Alain & Jean-Marc Pointet. 2002. Le management à l’épreuve des changements technologiques : impacts sur la société et les organisations. Paris : Éditions d’Organisation.10.1177/10534512040390030401 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Carbone, Pierre (dir.). 2002. Construire des indicateurs et des tableaux de bord. Villeurbanne : Presses de l’enssib.10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Centre d’études et de formation en enseignement supérieur (CEFES). Guide d’élaboration d’un plan de cours. www.cefes.umontreal.ca/ressources/guides/Plan_cours/avant.htm (consulté le 4 mai 2015).10.3200/CTCH.53.4.159-164 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Coker, Dana Rosenberg & Janice Nahra Friedel. 1991. The data collection matrix model: A tool for functional area and program evaluation. Research in Higher Education 32 (1) : 71-81.10.1007/BF00992834 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cuevas, Nuria M., Alexei G. Matveev & Marvin D. Feit. 2009. Curriculum mapping: An approach to study the coherence of program curricula. Department Chair 20 (1) : 23-26.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03093.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Daigle, Roy J., Herbert E. Longenecker Jr, Jeffrey P. Landry & J. Harold Pardue. 2004. Using the IS 2002 model curriculum for mapping an IS curriculum. Information Systems Education Journal 2 (1) : 3-6.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Danielson, M. A. 1995. The role of course syllabi in classroom socialization. In Meeting of the Central States Communication Association, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dufour, Christine. 2007. L’évaluation continue de programme comme stratégie d’ajustement aux environnements disciplinaire et professionnel pour les écoles de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information. In Partage de l’information dans un monde fragmenté : franchir les frontières. 35e Congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne des sciences de l’information (Montréal, Québec), sous la direction de Clément Arsenault & Kizim Dalkir. www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2007/dufour_2007.pdf (consulté le 7 mai 2015).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eberly, Mary B., Sarah E. Newton & Robert A. Wiggins. 2001. The syllabus as a tool for student-centered learning. JGE: The Journal of General Education 50 (1) : 56-74.10.1353/jge.2001.0003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, Michael B. & Robert E. Berkowitz. 1988. Curriculum Initiative: An Agenda and Strategy for Library Media Programs. Norwood, NJ : Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hausman, Jerome J. 1974. Mapping as an approach to curriculum planning. Curriculum Theory Network 4 (2/3) : 192-198.10.2307/1179238 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jacobs, Heidi Hayes (dir.). 2004. Getting Results with Curriculum Mapping. Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Koppang, Angela. 2004. Curriculum mapping: Building collaboration and communication. Intervention in School and Clinic 39 (3) : 154-161.10.1177/10534512040390030401 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Landry, Jeffrey P., Roy J. Daigle, Herbert E. Longenecker Jr & J. Harold Pardue. 2009. IS 2002 and ABET accreditation: Meeting the ABET program outcome criteria. In Proceedings of the ISECON 2009. Washington, DC : EDSIG, 1534.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Littlefield, V. M. 1999. My syllabus? It’s fine. Why do you ask? Or the syllabus: A tool for improving teaching and learning. In Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Matejka, Ken & Lance B. Kurke. 1994. Designing a great syllabus. College Teaching 42 (3) : 115-117.10.1080/87567555.1994.9926838 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Office of Teaching Effectiveness & Faculty Development. 1999. Launching a teaching system: A higher-level syllabus – 1. Nutshell Notes 7 (1). www.csuci.edu/facultynewsletter/documents/nnbootmaster.pm.pdf (consulté le 25 juin 2015).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Parkes, Jay, Tracy K. Fix & Mary B. Harris. What syllabi communicate about assessment in college classrooms. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 14 (1) : 61-83.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sallam, Rita L., Bill Hostmann, Kurt Schlegel, Joao Tapadinhas, Josh Parenteau & Thomas W. Oestreich. 2015. Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms. www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-2ADAAYM&ct=150223&st=sb (consulté le 4 mai 2015).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Slattery, Jeanne M. & Janet F. Carlson. 2005. Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practices. College Teaching 53 (4) : 159-164.10.3200/CTCH.53.4.159-164 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Uchiyama, Kay P. & Jean L. Radin. 2009. Curriculum mapping in higher education: A vehicle for collaboration. Innovative Higher Education 33: 271-280.10.1007/s10755-008-9078-8 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Veltri, Natasha F., Harold W. Webb, Alexei G. Matveev & Enrique G. Zapatero. 2011. Curriculum mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS curriculum. Journal of Information Systems Education 22 (1) : 31-42.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Voyer, Pierre. 1999. Tableaux de bord de gestion et indicateurs de performance. 2e éd. Sainte-Foy : Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- White, Bruce A. & Richard V. McCarthy. 2007. The development of a comprehensive assessment plan: One campus’ experience. Information Systems Education Journal 5 (35) : 3-16.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Willett, Timothy G. 2008. Current status of curriculum mapping in Canada and the UK. Medical Education 42 (8) : 786-793.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03093.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar