Abstracts
Abstract
Background: Strengths-based and culturally sensitive approaches to Indigenous healthcare are much needed within the Canadian healthcare system. This is where allyship comes in. Allyship is loosely defined as the actions of an individual who strives to advance the interests of marginalized groups in which they are not a member. This study investigated the concept of allyship with healthcare providers who were community-identified allies providing care for Indigenous patients.
Methods: Qualitative description methodology was utilized, and data was generated through semi-structured interviews with allies in and around the Edmonton area, in Canada. The interviews were conducted online, transcribed verbatim and then coded using thematic analysis.
Results: Interviews were conducted with 13 allies (eight physicians, four allied health professionals and one nurse). The results were captured into three main themes. The meaning of allyship demonstrated how allyship must be determined by the community, and encapsulates authentic action and advocacy, as well as working to create positive healthcare experiences. The experience of being an ally included commitment to the allyship journey, embracing emotions, and facing and disrupting systemic barriers. Finally, cultivating allyship in healthcare necessitated building and maintaining meaningful relationships with Indigenous people, and ongoing training and education.
Conclusion: The study results enabled a better understanding of how allies interact with their Indigenous patients within the confines of the healthcare system and could inform learning opportunities for those who seek to practice in a culturally humble way. In particular, transcending passive education and training modalities to include opportunities for real life interactions and the development of reciprocal relationships with Indigenous patients.
Résumé
Contexte : Des approches axées sur les forces et qui soient culturellement sensibles en matière de soins de santé autochtones sont grandement nécessaires dans le système de santé canadien. C'est là que la notion d’alliance inclusive entre en jeu. L'alliance inclusive est définie de manière générale comme l'action d'un individu qui s'efforce de promouvoir les intérêts de groupes marginalisés dont il n'est pas membre. Cette étude a examiné le concept d'alliance inclusive avec des prestataires de soins de santé qui étaient des alliés identifiés par la communauté et qui fournissaient des soins à des patients autochtones.
Méthodes : Une méthodologie qualitative a été utilisée. Les données ont été générées par des entretiens semi-structurés avec des alliés de la région d'Edmonton et des environs, au Canada. Les entretiens ont été menés virtuellement, transcrits verbatim et codés via une analyse thématique.
Résultats : Les entretiens ont été menés avec 13 alliés (huit médecins, quatre professionnels paramédicaux et une infirmière). Les résultats ont été regroupés en trois thèmes principaux. La signification de l'allié a montré comment ce dernier doit être déterminé par la communauté, et englobe l'action authentique et la défense des intérêts, ainsi que le travail afin de créer des expériences positives en matière de soins de santé. L'expérience d'être un allié comprend l'engagement dans son parcours, l'acceptation des émotions, ainsi que l'affrontement et la rupture des barrières systémiques. Enfin, pour cultiver l'alliance inclusive dans les soins de santé, il est nécessaire d'établir et d'entretenir des relations significatives avec les populations autochtones, ainsi qu'une formation et un enseignement continus.
Conclusion : Les résultats de l'étude ont permis de mieux comprendre comment les alliés inclusifs interagissent avec leurs patients autochtones dans les limites du système de soins de santé et pourraient éclairer les possibilités d'apprentissage pour ceux qui cherchent à pratiquer avec humilité sur le plan culturel. En particulier, il s'agit de transcender les modalités d'éducation et de formation passives pour inclure des occasions d'interactions réelles et le développement de relations réciproques avec les patients autochtones.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Government of Canada. First Nations in Canada. Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. 2017, May 2. Available from https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1307460755710/1536862806124. [Accessed on Feb 10, 2023]
- Tuhiwui Smith L. Decolonizing methodologies: research and Indigenous people. 1999. London, Zed Books.
- Wylie L, McConkey S. Insiders’ insight: discrimination against Indigenous peoples through the eyes of health care professionals. J Racial ethnic health dispar. 2019;6, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-018-0495-9
- Paradies Y. Colonisation, racism and indigenous health. J Pop Res 2016;33(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-016-9159-y
- Kolahdooz F, Nader F, Yi KJ, Sharma S. Understanding the social determinants of health among Indigenous Canadians: priorities for health promotion policies and actions. Global Health Action, 2015;8(1), 27968. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27968
- McLane P, Barnabe C, Holroyd BR, et al. First Nations emergency care in Alberta: descriptive results of a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21(1), 423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06415-2
- Bombay A, Matheson K, Anisman H. The intergenerational effects of Indian Residential Schools: implications for the concept of historical trauma. Transcult Psych. 2014;51(3), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461513503380
- Allan B, Smylie J. First People, second class treatment: the role of racism in the health and well-being of Indigenous people in Canada. 2015;Toronto: Wellesley Institute. Available at: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1204263/first-peoples-second-class-treatment/1757369/
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) (Ed.). Final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: honouring the truth, reconciling for the future. Volume one: Summary (Second printing). 2015. James Lorimer & Company Ltd., Publishers.
- Statistics Canada. Census Profile, 2016.
- Burm S, Dean L, Alcock D, LaDonna KA, Watling CJ, Bishop L. A narrative inquiry into non‐Indigenous medical educators and leaders participation in reconcilatory work. Med Educ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15360
- De Souza L, Schmader T. When people do allyship: a typology of allyship action. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241232732
- Pietri ES, Moser CE, Derricks V, & Johnson IR. A framework for understanding effective allyship. Nature Rev Psychol. 2024;1-15.
- Smith J, Puckett C, Simon W. Indigenous allyship: an overview (pp. 1-36). Waterloo, ON: Office of Aboriginal Initiatives, Wilfrid Laurier University. 2016. [Master’s thesis, Wilfred Laurier University, ON]
- Doria N, Biderman M, Sinno J, Boudreau J, Mackley MP, Bombay A. Barriers to including indigenous content in Canadian health professions curricula. Can J Educ.2021;44(3), 648-675. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27114418
- Brown KT. Perceiving allies from the perspective of non-dominant group members: comparisons to friends and activists. Current Psychol. 2015;34(4), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9284-8
- Nixon SA. The coin model of privilege and critical allyship: Implications for health. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7884-9
- Statistics Canada. Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population. Available from https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E.
- Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017;4, 2333393617742282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
- Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health, 2000;23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
- Mayan MJ. Essentials of qualitative inquiry. 2016. Routledge, Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315429250
- Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description–the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52
- Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Designs, Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
- Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Intern J Qual Meth. 2002;1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
- Sumerau JE, Forbes T, Grollman EA, Mathers LA. Constructing allyship and the persistence of inequality. Social Problems. 2021;68(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa003
- Knudsgaard H. How one becomes what one is: transformative journeys to allyship. [Master’s thesis, University of Victoria, BC]. 2019. Available from http://dspace.library.uvic.ca/bitstream/handle/1828/11480/Knudsgaard_Harald_MSW_2019.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=n
- Wilson, S. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. 2020. Fernwood publishing.
- McLane P, Bill L, Barnabe C. First Nations members’ emergency department experiences in Alberta: a qualitative study. Can J Emerg Med. 2021;23(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00009-3