Abstracts
Abstract
Background: Cognitive integration occurs when trainees make conceptual connections between relevant knowledges and is known to improve learning. While several experimental studies have demonstrated how text and audio-visual instruction can be designed to enhance cognitive integration, clinical skills training in real-world contexts may require alternative educational strategies. Introducing three-dimensional (3D) printed models during clinical skills instruction may offer unique learning opportunities to support cognitive integration.
Methods: Using case study methodology, we explore how learners and an instructor used 3D printed bones to augment their learning interactions during a clinical skills laboratory on shoulder on palpation, and to describe the instructional strategies with 3D printed bones that may support learning. Students (n = 21) worked in small groups and were given access to a 3D printed clavicle, scapula, and humerus. Data were collected through observation, a student focus group, and a semi-structured interview with the instructor. Thematic analysis to review and code the data and to generate themes.
Results: We developed four themes that describe how 3D printed models were used in the classroom and how they may support cognitive integration: classroom interactivity, visualization of anatomy, integrating knowledge, and educational potential.
Conclusions: The findings demonstrate several ways 3D printed models can augment how learners, instructors, and educational materials interact with one another and how readily learners make connections between different sources and types of knowledge. This research extends previous work by demonstrating how social learning processes and interactions with physical models can offer unique affordances that may support cognitive integration.
Résumé
Contexte : L'intégration cognitive se produit lorsque les apprenants établissent des liens conceptuels entre des connaissances pertinentes et est connue pour améliorer l'apprentissage. Alors que plusieurs études expérimentales ont démontré comment le texte et l'enseignement audiovisuel peuvent être conçus pour améliorer l'intégration cognitive, la formation aux compétences cliniques dans des contextes réels peut nécessiter d'autres stratégies éducatives. L'introduction de modèles imprimés en trois dimensions (3D) dans l'enseignement des compétences cliniques peut offrir des occasions d'apprentissage uniques pour favoriser l'intégration cognitive.
Méthodes : En utilisant la méthodologie des études de cas, cette étude explore comment les apprenants et un instructeur ont utilisé des os imprimés en 3D pour augmenter leurs interactions d'apprentissage au cours d'un laboratoire de compétences cliniques sur la palpation de l'épaule, et pour caractériser les stratégies d'enseignement avec des os imprimés en 3D qui peuvent favoriser l'apprentissage. Les étudiants (n=21) ont travaillé en petits groupes et ont eu accès à une clavicule, une omoplate et un humérus imprimés en 3D. Les données ont été collectées par l'observation, un groupe de discussion d'étudiants et un entretien semi-structuré avec l'instructeur. Une analyse thématique a permis de passer en revue et de coder les données et de dégager des thèmes.
Résultats : Quatre thèmes ont été développés pour décrire comment les modèles imprimés en 3D ont été utilisés en classe et comment ils peuvent favoriser l'intégration cognitive : interactivité en classe, visualisation de l'anatomie, intégration des connaissances et potentiel éducatif.
Conclusions : Les résultats démontrent que les modèles imprimés en 3D peuvent améliorer la façon dont les apprenants, les instructeurs et le matériel pédagogique interagissent et la facilité avec laquelle les apprenants établissent des liens entre les différents types et sources de connaissances. Cette recherche s’ajoute à des travaux antérieurs en démontrant comment les processus d'apprentissage social et les interactions avec les modèles physiques peuvent offrir des potentialités uniques susceptibles de favoriser l'intégration cognitive.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Goldman E, Schroth WS. Perspective: Deconstructing integration. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):729–734; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cad4.
- Kulasegaram KM, Martimianakis MA, Mylopoulos M, et al. Cognition before curriculum: rethinking the integration of basic science and clinical learning. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1578–1585; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a45def.
- Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EW, et al. Integration of basic sciences and clinical sciences in oral radiology education for dental students. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(6):757–763.
- Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ 2016;5(3):147–153; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0268-2.
- Chaudhary ZK, Mylopoulos M, Barnett R, et al. Reconsidering basic: integrating social and behavioral sciences to support learning. Acad Med. 2019;Publish Ahead of Print; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002907.
- Baghdady MT, Carnahan H, Lam EWN, et al. Dental and dental hygiene students’ diagnostic accuracy in oral radiology: effect of diagnostic strategy and instructional method. J Dent Educ 2014;78(9):1279–1285.
- Kulasegaram KM, Manzone JC, Ku C, et al. Cause and effect: testing a mechanism and method for the cognitive integration of basic science. Acad Med. 2015;90:S63–S69; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000896.
- Woods NN, Howey EHA, Brooks LR, et al. Speed kills? Speed, accuracy, encapsulations and causal understanding. Med Educ. 2006;40(10):973–979; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02556.x.
- Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):107–112; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02036.x.
- Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR. The role of biomedical knowledge in diagnosis of difficult clinical cases. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2007;12(4):417–426; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9054-y.
- Woods NN. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning: clinical expertise. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1173–1177; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02911.x.
- Baghdady MT, Pharoah MJ, Regehr G, et al. The role of basic sciences in diagnostic oral radiology. J Dent Educ 2009;73(10):1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.10.tb04810.x
- Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, et al. Knowing how and knowing why: testing the effect of instruction designed for cognitive integration on procedural skills transfer. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(1):61–74; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9774-1.
- Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, et al. Why content and cognition matter: integrating conceptual knowledge to support simulation-based procedural skills transfer. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34(6):969–977; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04959-y.
- Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM, Woods NN, et al. Making concepts material: a randomized trial exploring simulation as a medium to enhance cognitive integration and transfer of learning. simulation in healthcare: J Soc Sim Healthc. 2021;16(6):392–400; https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000543.
- Fenwick T, Dahlgren MA. Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory. Med Educ 2015;49(4):359–367; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12638.
- Hutchins E. Cognitive ecology. Topics Cogn Sci 2010;2(4):705–715; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x.
- Hazlehurst B. When I say … distributed cognition. Med Educ. 2015;49(8):755–756; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12672.
- O’Brien BC, Battista A. Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2020;25(2):483–509; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w.
- Grierson LEM, Barry M, Kapralos B, et al. The role of collaborative interactivity in the observational practice of clinical skills. Med Educ. 2012;46(4):409–416; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04196.x.
- Castillo J-M, Park YS, Harris I, et al. A critical narrative review of transfer of basic science knowledge in health professions education. Med Educ. 2018;52(6):592–604; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13519.
- Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7(4):321–325; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1468.
- O’Reilly MK, Reese S, Herlihy T, et al. Fabrication and assessment of 3D printed anatomical models of the lower limb for anatomical teaching and femoral vessel access training in medicine. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):71–79; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1538.
- Mafeld S, Nesbitt C, McCaslin J, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) printed endovascular simulation models: a feasibility study. Ann Transl Med 2017;5(3):42; https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.01.16.
- Lim KHA, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, et al. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9(3):213–221; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573.
- Smith CF, Tollemache N, Covill D, et al. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 2018;11(1):44–53; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718.
- Yuen J. What Is the Role of 3D Printing in undergraduate anatomy education? A scoping review of current literature and recommendations. MedSciEduc 2020;30(3):1321–1329; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00990-5.
- McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, et al. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(6):479–486; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475.
- Evans DJR, Pawlina W. Effects of Covid-19: the need to assess the real value of anatomy education. Anatom Sci Educ. 2021;14(2):129–131; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2061.
- Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10). https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
- Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, et al. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1178–1186; https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a365d.
- Khot Zaid, Quinlan Kaitlyn, Norman Geoffrey R., et al. The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):211–215; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1355.
- Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, et al. “Let’s get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6(4):216–224; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345.
- Wainman B, Wolak L, Pukas G, et al. The superiority of three-dimensional physical models to two-dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning. Med Educ. 2018;52(11):1138–1146; https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13683.
- Wainman B, Pukas G, Wolak L, et al. The critical role of stereopsis in virtual and mixed reality learning environments. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):401–412; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1928.
- Yin RK. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. SAGE Publications, Incorporated: Thousand Oaks; 2017.
- Flick U. Triangulation in data collection. In: The SAGE Handbook of qualitative data collection SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018; https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.
- Mogk J, Lloyd J, Bibliowicz J, et al. The parametric human project: building a probabilistic atlas of human anatomy. Natal, Brazil; 2013.
- Morgan DL, Hoffman K. Focus groups. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018; https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.
- Cheung JJH, Kulasegaram KM. Beyond the tensions within transfer theories: implications for adaptive expertise in the health professions. Adv in Health Sci Educ 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10174-y.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101; https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):846–854; https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
- Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 2021;18(3):328–352; https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
- Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2017;22(5):1071–1083; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9743-0.
- Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press: New York; 2014.; https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218.
- Greeno JG. Gibson’s affordances. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.101.2.336
- Greeno JG. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. Amer psychol.1998;53(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
- Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonom Bull Rev. 2002;9(4):625–636; https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322.
- Jang S, Black JB, Jyung RW. Embodied cognition and virtual reality in learning to visualize anatomy. n.d.;6.
- Smyth L, Carter J, Valter K, et al. Examining the short-, medium-, and long-term success of an embodied learning activity in the study of hand anatomy for clinical application. Anat Sci Educ 2021;14(2):201–209; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1987.
- Rabattu P-Y, Debarnot U, Hoyek N. Exploring the impact of interactive movement-based anatomy learning in real classroom setting among kinesiology students. Anat Sci Educ 2023;16(1):148–156; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2172.
- Brooks NB, Barner D, Frank M, et al. The role of gesture in supporting mental representations: the case of mental abacus arithmetic. Cogn Sci 2018;42(2):554–575; https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12527.
- Hendrick C, Heal J. Just because they’re engaged, it doesn’t mean they’re learning. n.d. Available from: https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/just-because-theyre-engaged-it-doesnt-mean-theyre-learning/ [Accessed on Mar 1, 2022].
- Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, et al. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2023;45(3):241–251; https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.