Educational approaches for social accountability in health professions training: A scoping review protocol

Zaccagnini, Marco; Cameron, Erin; Strasser, Roger; Razack, Saleem; Dubé, Tim

doi:https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78911

World Health Organization. Towards unity for health: Challenges and opportunities for partnership in health development : a working paper / Charles Boelen. World Health Organization. 2000. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66566

Google Scholar

Boelen C. Building a socially accountable health professions school: towards unity for health. Educ Health. 2004;17(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280410001711049

10.1080/13576280410001711049 Google Scholar

Ellaway R, Van Roy K, Preston R, et al. Translating medical school social missions to student experiences. Med Educ. 2018;52(2), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13417

10.1111/medu.13417 Google Scholar

Dharamsi S, Espinoza N, Cramer C, et al. Nurturing social responsibility through community service-learning: lessons learned from a pilot project. Med Teach. 2010;32(11), 905-911. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903434169

10.3109/01421590903434169 Google Scholar

Jacklin K, Strasser R, Peltier I. From the community to the classroom: the Aboriginal health curriculum at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine. Can J Rural Med. 2014;19(4), 143-150.

Google Scholar

Dubé TV, Cumyn A, Fourati M, et al. Pathways, journeys and experiences: Integrating curricular activities related to social accountability within an undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ. 2023. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15260

10.1111/medu.15260 Google Scholar

Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ. 2009;43(9), 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x

10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x Google Scholar

Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools (CACMS). CACMS standards and elements: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree. 2021. Ottawa, ON.

Google Scholar

Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Intern J Soc Res Meth. 2005;8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

10.1080/1364557032000119616 Google Scholar

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Impl Sci. 2010;5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 Google Scholar

Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P. et al. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2020. Joanna Briggs Institute. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIRM-20-01

10.46658/JBIRM-20-01 Google Scholar

Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern, C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methol. 2018;18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x Google Scholar

Zaccagnini M, Cameron E, Strasser R, Razack S, Dubé T. Tackling the nuances of social accountability: exploring the black box of teaching and learning experiences. 2024. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P93KY

Google Scholar

Gottlieb M, Haas MRC, Daniel M., et al. The scoping review: a flexible, inclusive, and iterative approach to knowledge synthesis. AEM Educ Train. 2021;5(3), e10609. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10609

10.1002/aet2.10609 Google Scholar

Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3), 520-532. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00123

10.11124/JBIES-22-00123 Google Scholar

Adams J, Hillier-Brown FC, Moore HJ, et al. Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: critical reflections on three case studies. System Rev. 2016;5(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y

10.1186/s13643-016-0337-y Google Scholar

Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92(2), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452

10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452 Google Scholar

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals Inter Med. 2018;169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

10.7326/M18-0850 Google Scholar

Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. A practical guide. London: SAGE Publications. 2021.

Google Scholar

Jordan J, Shah K, Phillips AW, et al. Use of the "stepback" method for education research consultation at the national level: a pilot study. AEM Educ Train. 2019;3(4), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10349

10.1002/aet2.10349 Google Scholar

Patton, M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. 2015.

Google Scholar

Educational approaches for social accountability in health professions training: A scoping review protocolApproches éducatives liées à la responsabilité sociale dans la formation en santé : un protocole d’une étude de portée[Record]

Bibliography

Appendices

Bibliography

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article