ror.org/03c4mmv16
Abstracts
Abstract
Introduction: Booster sessions can improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill retention among healthcare providers; however, the optimal timing of these sessions is unknown. This study aimed to explore differences in skill retention based on booster session timing.
Methods: After ethics approval, healthcare providers who completed an initial CPR training course were randomly assigned to either an early booster, late booster, or no booster group. Participants’ mean resuscitation scores, time to initiate compressions, and time to successfully provide defibrillation were assessed immediately post-course and four months later using linear mixed models.
Results: Seventy-three healthcare professionals were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences by randomization in the immediate post-test (9.7, 9.2, 8.9) or retention test (10.2, 9.8, and 9.5) resuscitation scores. No significant effects were observed for time to compression. Post-test time to defibrillation (mean ± SE: 112.8 ± 3.0 sec) was significantly faster compared to retention (mean ± SE: 120.4 ± 2.7 sec) (p = 0.04); however, the effect did not vary by randomization.
Conclusion: No difference was observed in resuscitation skill retention between the early, late, and no booster groups. More research is needed to determine the aspects of a booster session beyond timing that contribute to skill retention.
Résumé
Introduction : Des séances de rappel peuvent favoriser le maintien des compétences en réanimation cardio-pulmonaire (RCP) chez les professionnels de la santé; toutefois, le moment optimal pour offrir ces séances est inconnu. Cette étude visait à explorer les différences dans le maintien des compétences en fonction du moment où intervient la séance de rappel.
Méthodes : Après avoir obtenu une approbation éthique, nous avons réparti au hasard des professionnels de la santé ayant suivi une formation initiale en RCP entre un groupe qui a reçu un rappel précoce, un groupe qui a eu un rappel tardif et un groupe qui n’a pas reçu de séance de rappel. Les scores moyens de réussite de la réanimation, le temps moyen pris avant de commencer les compressions et le temps moyen pris pour effectuer avec succès une défibrillation ont été évalués immédiatement après la séance et quatre mois plus tard, à l’aide de modèles mixtes linéaires.
Résultats : Les données de 73 professionnels de la santé ont été analysées. Il n’y a pas eu de différences significatives à la suite de la randomisation dans les scores de réanimation au post-test immédiat (9,7; 9,2; 8,9) et au test sur le maintien des compétences (10,2; 9,8 et 9,5). Aucun effet significatif n’a été observé en lien avec le délai avant d’entamer les compressions. Le délai de défibrillation était significativement plus court après la séance (moyenne ± SE : 112,8 ± 3,0 sec) que lors du test de maintien des compétences (moyenne ± SE : 120,4 ± 2,7 sec) (p=0,04); cependant, l’effet n’a pas été différent d’un groupe à un autre.
Conclusion : Aucune différence n’a été observée sur le plan du maintien des compétences en réanimation entre les groupes avec rappel précoce, avec rappel tardif et sans rappel. De plus amples travaux sont nécessaires pour déterminer les caractéristiques d’une séance de rappel, autres que le moment où elle intervient, qui contribueraient au maintien des compétences.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132(18):S414–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259
- Monsieurs KRG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation 2015;95:1–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038
- Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2013;128(4):417–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654
- Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, Davis DP. What is the role of chest compression depth during out of hospital. Crit Care Med 2013;40(4):1192–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8bb
- American Heart Association. CPR facts & stats [Internet]. 2021 Available from https://cpr.heart.org/en/resources/cpr-facts-and-stats [Accessed on Dec 6, 2021].
- Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2015;43(4):840–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824
- Hamilton R. Nurses’ knowledge and skill retention following cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2005;51(3):288–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03491.x
- Hunt EA, Fiedor-Hamilton M, Eppich WJ. Resuscitation education: narrowing the gap between evidence-based resuscitation guidelines and performance using best educational practices. Pediatr Clin North Am 2008;55(4):1025–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.007
- Oermann MH, Kardong-Edgren SE, Odom-Maryon T. Competence in CPR. Am J Nurs 2012;112(5):43–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000414320.71954.34
- Yang CW, Yen ZS, McGowan JE, et al. A systematic review of retention of adult advanced life support knowledge and skills in healthcare providers. Resuscitation [Internet] 2012;83(9):1055–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.027
- Bhanji F, Finn JC, Lockey A, et al. Part 8: education, implementation, and teams: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation 2015;132:S242–68. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000277
- Wolfe H, Maltese M, Niles D, et al. Blood pressure directed booster trainings improve intensive care unit provider retention of excellent CPR skills. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015;31(11):743–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000394
- Sutton RM, Niles D, Meaney PA, et al. Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Peds 2011;128(1). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
- Kardong-Edgren S, Oermann MH, Jastrzembski TS, et al. Baseline cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill performance of nursing students is improved after one resuscitation quality improvement skill refresher. J Nurses Prof Dev 2020;36(2):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000614
- Niles DE, Nishisaki A, Sutton RM, et al. Improved retention of chest compression psychomotor skills with brief “rolling refresher” training. Simul Healthc 2017;12(4):213–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000228
- Schunk D. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. 6th ed. London, United Kingdom: Pearson; 2011.
- Anderson R, Sebaldt A, Lin Y, Cheng A. Optimal training frequency for acquisition and retention of high-quality CPR skills: a randomized trial. Resuscitation 2019;135(October 2018):153–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.033
- Bender J, Kennally K, Shields R, Overly F. Does simulation booster impact retention of resuscitation procedural skills and teamwork? J Perinatol 2014;34(9):664.
- Kaczorowski K, Levitt C, Hammond M, et al. Retention of neonatal resuscitation skills and knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Med 1998;30(10):705–11.
- Rohrer D, Pashler H. Increasing retention without increasing study time. Educ. 2007;132.
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):672–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Available at https://cpr.heartandstroke.ca/ [Accessed Mar 31, 2019].
- Li Q, Zhou R hua, Liu J, et al. Pre-training evaluation and feedback improved skills retention of basic life support in medical students. Resuscitation 2013;84(9):1274–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.017
- Lauridsen KG, Løfgren B, Brogaard L, Paltved C, Hvidman L, Krogh K. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for healthcare professionals. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc 2021;Publish Ah(00):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000608
- Kemery S, Kelly K, Wilson C, Wheeler CA. Brief bedside refresher training to practice cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills in the ambulatory surgery center setting. J Contin Educ Nurs 2015;46(8):370–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20150721-04
- Matterson HH, Szyld D, Green BR, et al. Neonatal resuscitation experience curves: simulation based mastery learning booster sessions and skill decay patterns among pediatric residents. J Perinat Med 2018;46(8):934–41.