Abstracts
Abstract
Artists have long worked in fields that are not related to art, instigating innovative ways of working in different institutional contexts from health to business to technology. Civic systems are no exception, with artists spearheading new ways of operating within government agencies. Some artists work covertly, bringing creative methods to traditional civic roles, while others are invited into government agencies in temporary positions as artists in residence addressing specific concerns. As local governments are increasingly challenged to provide services and operate equitably amid eroding public trust, opportunities for cross-sector collaboration uniting artists with government staff are compelling mechanisms for them to cocreate the necessary conditions for systemic change.
The research reported herein explores how artists are engaged in cross-sectoral collaborative models of cultural policy within local governments. Governments already recognize the potential of formal artist residency programs conducted over set periods of time to advance civic goals. In addition, artists have been engaged in this work through informal government partnerships in departments including transportation, parks, and public health. Some collaborations act as applied research enacted internally, bringing more complex understandings of government operations, while others become deep processes of external engagement to expand awareness of local concerns.
This paper presents a framework categorizing the structures in which artists work within government agencies to advance civic goals. The framework is based on research conducted on artists who were embedded in the government across the US from 2020 through 2022. Describing these structures highlights new ways of working within local government that center artists as agents that promote change; this paper lays the foundation for understanding how they operate and delineates opportunities and challenges for the artists and the governments that initiate collaboration. The framework is a foundation for cultural policy makers to evaluate artist in residence in government programs as a cultural policy tool and enable evaluation of the impact of their implementation.
Keywords:
- artist in residence,
- cross-sectoral collaboration,
- government,
- cultural policy
Résumé
Les artistes travaillent depuis longtemps dans des domaines qui n'ont rien à voir avec l'art, en proposant des méthodes de travail novatrices dans différents contextes institutionnels, de la santé à l'entreprise en passant par la technologie. Les systèmes civiques ne font pas exception à la règle, les artistes étant à l'origine de nouveaux modes de fonctionnement au sein des agences gouvernementales. Certains artistes travaillent clandestinement, apportant des méthodes créatives aux rôles civiques traditionnels, tandis que d'autres sont invités dans les agences gouvernementales à des postes temporaires en tant qu'artistes en résidence pour répondre à des préoccupations spécifiques. Alors que les collectivités locales sont de plus en plus contraintes de fournir des services et de fonctionner de manière équitable dans un contexte d'érosion de la confiance du public, les possibilités de collaboration intersectorielle entre les artistes et le personnel de l'administration sont des mécanismes convaincants qui leur permettent de cocréer les conditions nécessaires à un changement systémique.
La recherche présentée ici explore la manière dont les artistes sont engagés dans des modèles de collaboration intersectorielle en matière de politique culturelle au sein des gouvernements locaux. Les gouvernements reconnaissent déjà le potentiel des programmes formels de résidence d'artistes menés sur des périodes déterminées pour faire avancer les objectifs civiques. En outre, les artistes ont été engagés dans ce travail par le biais de partenariats gouvernementaux informels dans des départements tels que les transports, les parcs et la santé publique. Certaines collaborations font office de recherche appliquée en interne, permettant une compréhension plus complexe des opérations gouvernementales, tandis que d'autres deviennent des processus profonds d'engagement externe visant à accroître la sensibilisation aux préoccupations locales.
Cet article présente un cadre catégorisant les structures dans lesquelles les artistes travaillent au sein des agences gouvernementales pour faire avancer les objectifs civiques. Ce cadre est basé sur des recherches menées sur des artistes qui ont été intégrés dans le gouvernement à travers les États-Unis de 2020 à 2022. La description de ces structures met en lumière de nouvelles façons de travailler au sein des collectivités locales, qui font des artistes des agents de promotion du changement. Ce document jette les bases d'une compréhension de leur fonctionnement et délimite les opportunités et les défis pour les artistes et les gouvernements qui initient la collaboration. Le cadre est une base pour les décideurs culturels afin d'évaluer les artistes en résidence dans les programmes gouvernementaux en tant qu'outil de politique culturelle et de permettre l'évaluation de l'impact de leur mise en œuvre.
Mots-clés :
- artiste en résidence,
- collaboration intersectorielle,
- gouvernement,
- politique culturelle
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504
- Antal, A. B., & Strauß, A. (2013). Record, replay, shuffle and switch: How to see more and differently with artists in organizations. International Journal of Professional Management, 8(5), 17–28.
- ArteEast. (2011). Residency resource handbook. ArteEast and The Delphina Foundation. https://issuu.com/arteeast/docs/residencyresourcehandbook
- Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). Seeing more and seeing differently: Sensemaking, mindfulness, and the workarts. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1505–1530.
- Berthoin Antal, A., & Strauß, A. (2014). Not only art’s task—Narrating bridges between unusual experiences with art and organizational identity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.11.001
- Bonin-Rodriguez, P. (2015). Performing policy: How contemporary politics and cultural programs redefined U.S. artists for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi: 10.1057/9781137356505
- Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
- Cole, H. V. S., Anguelovski, I., Baró, F., García-Lamarca, M., Kotsila, P., Pulgar, C. P. del, Shokry, G., & Triguero-Mas, M. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Power and privilege, gentrification, and urban environmental justice in the global north. Cities & Health, 0(0), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1785176
- Daniel, J. L., & Kim, M. (2020). Creative placemaking: Creating change by building partnerships. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(1), Article 1. doi: 10.20899/jpna.6.1.96-110
- Du, J., King, R., & Chanchani, R. (2020). Tackling inequality in cities is essential for fighting COVID-19. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/insights/tackling-inequality-cities-essential-fighting-covid-19
- Dzigbede, K. D., Gehl, S. B., & Willoughby, K. (2020). Disaster resiliency of U.S. local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 634–643. doi: 10.1111/puar.13249
- Finkelpearl, T. (2013). What we made: Conversations on art and social cooperation. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Frenette, A. (2017). The rise of creative placemaking: Cross-sector collaboration as cultural policy in the United States. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 47(5), 333–345. doi: 10.1080/10632921.2017.1391727
- Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by network the new shape of the public sector. Brookings Institution Press.
- Halbert, D. (2018). State of copyright: The complex relationships of cultural creation in a globalized world. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
- Hamby, E. (2018, December 18). Who are the naturally occurring artists in your municipal agency? Elizabeth Hamby. http://www.elizabethhamby.com/journal
- Harris, C. (Ed.). (1999). Art and innovation: The Xerox PARC artist-in-residence program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Hart, J. (2018, December 26). How an artist became a leader on a $90 million infrastructure project. Forecast Public Art. https://forecastpublicart.org/how-an-artist-became-a-leader-on-a-90-million-infrastructure-project/
- Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook. Behtesda: Jorge Pinto Books.
- Jackson, M. R. (2018). Creative placemaking and expansion of opportunity – Observations and reflections. Kresge Foundation. https://kresge.org/sites/default/files/library/cp_white_paper_2_for_posting.pdf
- Klein, B., Moss, G., & Edwards, L. (2015). Understanding copyright: Intellectual property in the digital age. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Lingo, E. L., & Tepper, S. J. (2013). Looking back, looking forward: Arts-based careers and creative work. Work and Occupations, 40(4), 337–363. doi: 10.1177/0730888413505229
- Lithgow, M., & Wall, K. (2017). Embedded aesthetics: Artist-in-residencies as sites of discursive struggle and social innovation. Seismopolite: Journal of Art and Politics. https://www.seismopolite.com/embedded-aesthetics-artist-in-residencies-as-sites-of-discursive-struggle-and-social-innovation
- Markusen, A. (2013). Fuzzy concepts, proxy data: Why indicators would not track creative placemaking success. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 17(3), 291–303. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2013.836291
- Martel, F., Page, R., & Schmuki, F. (2019). Entrepreneurial strategies for a positive economy”: 3rd creative economies report. Zurich University of the Arts. http://www.nxt-creatives.eu/knowledgecentre/entrepreneurial-strategies-for-a-positive-economy
- Menger, P.-M. (2006). Artistic labor markets: Contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In V. A. Ginsburg & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Vol. 1, pp. 765–811). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01022-2
- Nakagawa, A. (2022). A.I.R. head: Anatomy of an artist in residence. Los Angelas: Writ Large Press.
- Neidich, W. (2012). The artist residency in the 21st century: Experiments in cultural potentiality and contamination. ArteEast Quarterly, Winter. https://www.warrenneidich.com/the-artist-residency-in-the-21st-century-experiments-in-cultural-potentiality-and-contamination/
- O’Brian, M. (2013, July 23). Review: A wicked problem. Fogo Island Arts. https://www.fogoislandarts.ca/news/dialogues/a-wicked-problem/
- Packard, C. (2021). Julia Weist’s “Public Record” probes the impact of artists on cities. Hyperallergic. https://hyperallergic.com/670621/julia-weists-public-record-probes-the-impact-of-artists-on-cities/
- Phillips, P. C., Finkelpearl, T., Harris, L., Lippard, L. R., & Ukeles, M. (2016). Mierle Laderman Ukeles: Maintenance art. Prestel. Redaelli, E. (2020) Understanding American cultural policy: the multi-level governance of the arts and humanities, Policy Studies, 41(1), 80-97, doi: 10.1080/01442872.2018.1554804
- Schiuma, P. G. (2009). The value of arts-based initiatives (Mapping Arts-Based Initiatives, p. 51). Arts & Business.
- Schupbach, J. (2017). So how do you do creative placemaking? In How to Do Creative Placemaking (pp. 1–3). National Endowment for the Arts. https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/How-to-do-Creative-Placemaking_Jan2017.pdf
- Sidford, H., & Frasz, A. (2016). Creativity connects: Trends and conditions affecting U.S. artists (Center for Cultural Innovation and National Endowment for the Arts Report). National Endowment for the Arts. https://www.arts.gov/impact/research/publications/creativity-connects-trends-and-conditions-affecting-us-artists
- Sköldberg, U. J., Woodilla, J., & Antal, A. B. (Eds.). (2015). Artistic interventions in organizations: Research, theory and practice (1st ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315743486
- Tavecchia, E. (2017). Mierle Laderman Ukeles “Maintenance Art” at Queens Museum, New York. Mousse Magazine. http://moussemagazine.it/mierle-laderman-ukeles-maintenance-art-queens-museum-new-york/
- Taylor, J. K. (2021). Art practice as policy practice: Framing the work of artists embedded in government. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society. 51(4), doi: 10.1080/10632921.2021.1925193 Whitaker, A. (2022) Generous and ungenerous contracts: Case study of the artist William Powhida’s Grevsky and Store-to-Own contracts, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 52(3), 143-168, doi: 10.1080/10632921.2022.2041141
- Whitehead, F. (2016, April 26). The embedded artist: Double agent. A Blade of Grass. http://clients.thejenyuan.com/abog/growing-dialogues/the-embedded-artist-double-agent/
- Whitehead, F. (2020). Embedded artist. In F. Martel & H. Wickert (Eds.), Embedded Artists: Artists Outside the Art World: The World in Quest of Artists (pp. 10–37). Zurich University of the Arts.
- Woronkowicz, J. (2020). The embedded artist worker: Shifting perspectives on artists in the labor force. In F. Martel & H. Wickert (Eds.), Embedded Artists: Artists Outside the Art World: The World in Quest of Artists (pp. 124–135). Zurich University of the Arts.
- Zitcer, A. (2018). Making up creative placemaking. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi: 10.1177/0739456X18773424