Abstracts
Abstract
Despite known inequalities of digital access in rural Canada, we know little about the foundational digital literacies learning needs of students attending rural elementary schools. This exploratory case study, conducted in Ontario, presents 13 rural-serving Grade 4–6 teachers’ insights on the access needs and digital literacies learning needs of their students. Results point to a set of mixed digital materialities and opportunities across home and school that raise concerns of digital marginalization for children who are least connected. Teachers named 14 unique digital literacies learning needs in relation to online reading, digital writing, and participation. Their insights also reflect an understanding of digital literacies learning as situated in a complex assemblage of structural, social, emotional, cultural, cognitive, developmental, technological, and material considerations. Implications for policy and the design of uniquely rural solutions to digital literacies instruction are discussed.
Keywords:
- digital literacies learning,
- rural teacher insights,
- elementary education,
- digital inequalities,
- rural digital divides
Résumé
Même si les inégalités en matière d’accès au numérique dans les régions rurales du Canada sont connues, notre compréhension des besoins fondamentaux des élèves des milieux ruraux en matière d’apprentissage des littératies numériques est très limitée. Cette étude de cas exploratoire, menée en Ontario, présente les perceptions de 13 enseignant[e]s de 4e à 6e année en milieu rural sur les besoins de leurs élèves en matière d’accès au numérique et d’apprentissage des littératies numériques. Dans l’ensemble, les participant[e]s ont décrit une variété de conditions d’accès au numérique à la maison et à l’école pour leurs élèves. Tout en considérant le lien entre l’accès au numérique et le développement des littératies numériques, les analyses soulèvent des inquiétudes quant à la marginalisation numérique des enfants les moins branchés. Les participant[e]s identifient 14 besoins d’apprentissage uniques quant à la lecture en ligne, l’écriture numérique et la participation. La synthèse de leurs perceptions reflète une compréhension complexe et située de l’apprentissage des littératies numériques, car les dimensions structurelles, sociales, émotionnelles, culturelles, cognitives, développementales, technologiques et matérielles figuraient dans les observations partagées. La discussion fait état de l’importance de ces données pour le développement de la politique et pour la conception de solutions spécifiques à l’enseignement des littératies numériques en milieu rural.
Mots-clés :
- l’apprentissage des littératies numériques,
- les perceptions du personnel enseignant en milieu rural,
- éducation primaire,
- les inégalités numériques,
- les fractures numériques en milieu rural
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Biographical notes
Michelle Schira Hagerman is Associate Professor of Educational Technologies at the University of Ottawa Faculty of Education where she is also Program Director of Teacher Education. Her current research focuses on digital literacies teaching and learning through critical making, and the digital literacies learning experiences of children growing up in rural communities in Canada.
Sima Neisary is a Ph.D. candidate in the Faculty of Education at the University of Ottawa. Her research focuses on digital literacies and digital inequities, with a particular emphasis on English language learners and immigrants/newcomers. Sima is dedicated to amplifying the voices of ELLs and newcomers, advocating for inclusive and equitable educational opportunities to mitigate digital inequities for those at risk of being left behind.
Bibliography
- Brisson-Boivin, K., & McAleese, S. (2021, April 13). How digital literacy can help close the digital divide. Policy Options. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/fr/magazines/april-2021/how-digital-literacy-can-help-close-the-digital-divide/
- Building Broadband Faster Act, SC 2021, c. 2. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/21b02
- Canadian Radio-Television and Communications Commission. (2020). Communications monitoring report: LTE and broadband availability. https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/policyMonitoring/2020/cmr4.htm
- Canadian Radio-Television and Communications Commission. (2023). Broadband fund: Closing the digital divide in Canada. https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/internet/internet.htm
- Chen, B. (2015). Exploring the digital divide: The use of digital technologies in Ontario public schools. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 41(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21432/t2kp6f
- Cho, B. Y. (2014). Competent adolescent readers’ use of Internet reading strategies: A think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction, 32(3), 253–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.918133
- Cho, B.-Y., & Afflerbach, P. (2015). Reading on the Internet. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(6), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.387
- Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11421979
- Coiro, J. (2020). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302
- Coladarci, T. (2007). Improving the yield of rural education research: An editor’s swan song. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(3), 1–9. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/22-3.pdf
- Collin, S., Karsenti, T., Ndimubandi, A., & Saffari, H. (2016). Connected generation? Digital inequalities in elementary and high school students according to age and socioeconomic level / Une génération connectée? Inégalités numériques chez les élèves du primaire et du secondaire selon l’âge et le milieu socioéconomique. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21432/T21K7T
- Collins, J. L., & Wellman, B. (2010). Small town in the Internet society: Chapleau is no longer an island. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1344–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210361689
- Dahlström, H. (2022). Students as digital multimodal text designers: A study of resources, affordances, and experiences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13171
- Dewaard, H., & Hoechsmann, M. (2021). Landscape and terrain of digital literacy: Policy and practice in Canada in the twenty-first century. In D. Frau-Meigs, S. Kotilainen, M. Pathak-Shelat, M. Hoechsmann, & S. R. Poyntz (Eds.), The handbook of media education research (pp. 363–371). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166900
- Doyle-Jones, C. (2019). “Technology brings learning to life”: Planning writing opportunities through multimodal and digital resources. Language and Literacy, 21(2), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29468
- Dow-Fleisner, S. J., Seaton C. L., Li, E., Plamondon, K., Oelke, N., Kurtz, D., Jones, C., Currie, L. M., Pesut, B., Hasan, K., Rush, K. L. (2022). Internet access is a necessity: A latent class analysis of COVID-19 related challenges and the role of technology use among rural community residents. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 845. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13254-1
- Eppley, K., Peterson, S. S., & Wood, J. (2022). Representations of Indigenous and non-Indigenous rural ways of being in picture books. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 18(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/1888672
- Eppley, K., Wood, J., & Stagg-Peterson, S. (2024). Resistance literature: Representations of land and Indigeneity in Indigenous-authored, Canadian award-winning rural young adult and middle-grade fiction. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 67(4), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1318
- Forzani, E. (2018). How well can students evaluate online science information? Contributions of prior knowledge, gender, socioeconomic status, and offline reading ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(4), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.218
- Hagerman, M. S. (2017). Disrupting students’ online reading and research habits: The LINKS intervention and its impact on multiple Internet text integration processes. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 18(1), 105–156. https://literacyandtechnologyorg.files.wordpress.com/2023/09/jlt_v18_1_hagerman.pdf
- Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., & Corbett, B. A. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: The impact of demographic factors on access to the Internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.891633
- Hambly, H., & Rajabiun, R. (2021). Rural broadband: Gaps, maps and challenges. Telematics and Informatics, 60, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101565
- Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using case study in education research. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913851
- Hampton, K. N., & Shin, I. (2023). Disconnection more problematic for adolescent self-esteem than heavy social media use: Evidence from access inequalities and restrictive media parenting in rural America. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 626–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221117466
- Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
- Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782
- Hargittai, E., & Shaw, A. (2015). Mind the skills gap: The role of Internet know-how and gender in contributions to Wikipedia. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711
- Hébert, C., Jenson, J., & Terzopoulos, T. (2021). “Access to technology is the major challenge”: Teacher perspectives on barriers to DGBL in K-12 classrooms. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753021995315
- Howard, P. N., Busch, L., & Sheets, P. (2010). Comparing digital divides: Internet access and social inequality in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2010v35n1a2192
- Hoechsmann, M., & DeWaard, H. (2015). Mapping digital literacy policy and practice in the Canadian education landscape. MediaSmarts. http://mediasmarts.ca/teacher‐resources/ digital‐literacy‐framework/mapping‐digital‐literacy‐policy‐practice‐canadian‐education‐ landscape
- Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. (2021). National broadband service availability map. https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/sitt/bbmap/hm.html?lang=eng
- Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Marttunen, M., Hautala, J., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2018). Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
- Kiili, C., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Hagerman, M. S., Räikkönen, E., & Jyrkiäinen, A. (2022). Adolescents’ credibility justifications when evaluating online texts. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7241–7450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10907-x
- LaRose, R., Gregg, J. L., Strover, S., Straubhaar, J., & Carpenter, S. (2007). Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6–7), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.04.004
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang.
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2018). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, M. Sailors, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of literacy (7th ed., pp. 319–346). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110592-19
- Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Stoilova, M. (2021). The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people’s lives and wellbeing: A systematic evidence review. New Media and Society, 25(5), 1176–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043189
- Macedo-Rouet, M., Potocki, A., Scharrer, L., Ros, C., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2019). How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on adolescents’ evaluation of web information quality. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.241
- McLean, C., & Rowsell, J. (2020) Digital literacies in Canada. In J. Lacina & R. Griffith (Eds.) Preparing globally minded literacy teachers (pp. 177–198). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429397790
- McCrory, A., Best, P., & Maddock, A. (2022). “It’s just one big vicious circle”: Young people’s experiences of highly visual social media and their mental health. Health Education Research, 37(3), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyac010
- Moje, E. B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.54468j6204x24157
- MediaSmarts. (2014). Use, understand, & engage: A digital media literacy framework for Canadian schools. https://mediasmarts.ca/teacher-resources/use-understand-engage-digital-media-literacy-framework-canadian-schools
- MediaSmarts. (2015). Digital literacy fundamentals: What is digital literacy? https://mediasmarts.ca/digital-media-literacy/general-information/digital-media-literacy-fundamentals/digital-literacy-fundamentals
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Mingo, I., & Bracciale, R. (2018). The Matthew effect in the Italian digital context: The progressive marginalisation of the “poor.” Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 629–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1511-2
- Nelson, K. S., Nguyen, T. D., Brownstein, N. A., Garcia, D., Walker, H. C., Watson, J. T., & Xin, A. (2021). Definitions, measures, and uses of rurality: A systematic review of the empirical and quantitative literature. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.035
- Nichols, T. P., & LeBlanc, R. J. (2020). Beyond apps: Digital literacies in a platform society. The Reading Teacher, 74(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1926
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2023). Curriculum: Elementary language. https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/curriculum/elementary-language
- Orben, A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2023). How social media affects teen mental health: A missing link. Nature, 614(7948), 410–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00402-9
- Peterson, S. S., & Robinson, R. B. (2020). Rights of Indigenous children: Reading children’s literature through an Indigenous knowledges lens. Education Sciences, 10(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100281
- Petrone, R., & Wynhoff Olsen, A. (2021). Teaching English in rural communities: Toward a critical rural English pedagogy. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006
- Rich, K., Hall, H., & Nelson, G. (2021). State of rural Canada 2021: Opportunities, recovery, and resiliency in changing times. Canadian Rural Revitalization Foundation. https://sorc.crrf.ca/fullreport2021/
- Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., van Oosten, J. M. F., & Igartua, J. J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
- Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
- Statistics Canada. (2021). 2016 Census: Census profile. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/index-eng.cfm
- Statistics Canada. (2022). Census in brief: Population growth in Canada’s rural areas 2016-2021. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2021/as-sa/98-200-x/2021002/98-200-x2021002-eng.cfm
- Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., & Khazbak, R. (2021). Investigating risks and opportunities for children in a digital world: A rapid review of the evidence on children’s internet use and outcomes. UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. https://www.end-violence.org/sites/default/files/paragraphs/download/Investigating-Risks-and-Opportunities-for-Children-in-a-Digital-World.pdf
- Twenge, J. M. (2020). Increases in depression, self‐harm, and suicide among U.S. adolescents after 2012 and links to technology use: Possible mechanisms. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 2(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20190015
- US Department of Education. (2024). A call to action for closing digital access, design and use divides: National educational technology plan. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2024/01/NETP24.pdf
- van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide inequality in the information society. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
- Ventrella, F. M., & Cotnam-Kappel, M. (2024). Examining digital capital and digital inequalities in Canadian elementary schools: Insights from teachers. Telematics and Informatics, 86, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102070
- Vissenberg, J., d’Haenens, L., & Livingstone, S. (2022). Digital literacy and online resilience as facilitators of young people’s well-being? European Psychologist, 27(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000478 Ó2022
- Warschauer, M., & Tate, T. (2018). Digital divides and social inclusion. In K. A. Mills, A. Stornaiuolo, A. Smith, & J. Zacher Pandya (Eds.) Handbook of writing, literacies and education in digital cultures (pp. 63–75). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315465258
- Wavrock, D., Schellenberg, G., & Schimmele, C. (2021). Internet-use typology of Canadians: Online activities and digital skills. Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2021008-eng.htm
- Westheimer, J., & Hagerman, M. S. (2021). After COVID: Lessons from a pandemic for K-12 education. In T. Vaillancourt (Ed.), Children and schools during COVID-19 and beyond: Engagement and connection through opportunity. Royal Society of Canada. https://rsc-src.ca/sites/default/files/C%26S%20PB_EN_1.pdf
- Wilson, J. R., Briere, J. L., & Nahachewsky, J. (2015). Rural high school students’ digital literacy. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 16(2), 55–75. http://www.literacyandtechnology.org/uploads/1/3/6/8/136889/jlt_v16_2_wilson_nahacewsky_briere.pdf
- Wright, K. L., Hodges, T. S., & McTigue, E. M. (2019). A validation program for the self-beliefs, writing-beliefs, and attitude survey: A measure of adolescents’ motivation toward writing. Assessing Writing, 39, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.004
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
Appendices
Notes biographiques
Michelle Schira Hagerman est professeure agrégée avec spécialisation en technologies éducatives à la Faculté d’éducation de l’Université d’Ottawa où elle est la directrice du programme en Teacher Education. Ses recherches actuelles explorent l’apprentissage et l’enseignement des littératies numériques par des approches bricoleurs critiques et en contextes de scolarisation ruraux au Canada.
Sima Neisary est candidate au doctorat à la Faculté d'éducation de l'Université d'Ottawa. Ses recherches portent sur les littératies numériques et les inégalités numériques, avec un accent particulier sur les apprenants de la langue anglaise et les immigrants/nouveaux arrivants. Sima est dédiée à amplifier les voix des apprenants de la langue anglaise et des nouveaux arrivants, en plaidant pour des opportunités éducatives inclusives et équitables afin de réduire les inégalités numériques pour ceux qui risquent d'être laissés pour compte.