ror.org/05wwfbb42
Abstracts
Résumé
Le principe de ce jeu, qui s’adresse essentiellement aux jeunes chercheurs, est le suivant : les participants sont invités à incarner une équipe de recherche, chargée d’étudier les impacts sanitaires inhérents à la conduite d’activités minières en Bolivie. Ce jeu interactif, qui promeut la réflexion éthique et la prise de décision par un processus dialogique et réflexif, a été conçu afin de mettre en pratique l’intégration de la prise de décision, l’interaction entre les participants et la construction conjointe de sens.
Mots-clés :
- bioéthique,
- enseignement,
- jeu interactif,
- prise de décision,
- éthique de la recherche
Abstract
The principle of this game, which is primarily aimed at junior researchers, is as follows: participants are asked to embody a research team studying the health impacts associated with the conduct of mining activities in Bolivia. This interactive game, which promotes ethical reflection and decision-making through a dialogical and reflexive process, was designed to put into practice the integration of decision-making, interaction between the participants and the co-construction of meaning.
Keywords:
- bioethics,
- teaching,
- interactive game,
- decision making,
- research ethics
Appendices
Bibliographie
- 1. Callahan D. Goals in the Teaching of Ethics. In: Callahan D, Bok S, editors. Ethics Teaching in Higher Education. New York: Springer US; 1980. p. 61-80.
- 2. Davis M. Ethics and the University. London: Routledge; 1999.
- 3. Reiss MJ. Teaching Ethics in Science. Studies in Science Education. 1999;34(1):115-40.
- 4. Smith S, Fryer-Edwards K, Diekema DS, III CHB. Finding Effective Strategies for Teaching Ethics: A Comparison Trial of Two Interventions. Academic Medicine. 2004;79(3):265-71.
- 5. Lin CF, Lu MS, Chung CC, Yang CM. A comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching in nursing ethics education. Nursing Ethics. 2010;17(3):373-82.
- 6. Ubel PA. The Predictable Irrationality of Righteous Minds, and the Work of Ethicists. Hastings Center Report 43. 2013;3:18-22.
- 7. Downie R, Clarkeburn H. Approaches to the teaching of bioethics and professional ethics in undergraduate courses. Bioscience Education. 2005;5.
- 8. Guillemin M, Heggen K. The Narrative Approach as a Learning Strategy in the Formation of Novice Researchers. Qualitative Health Research. 2011;22(5):700-7.
- 9. Molewijk AC, Abma TA, Stolper M, Widdershoven GAM. Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. Journal for Medical Ethics. 2008;34:120-4.
- 10. Hundert EM, Douglas-Steele D, Bickel J. Context in medical education: the informal ethics curriculum. Medical Education. 1996;30:353-64.
- 11. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The Hidden Curriculum, Ethics Teaching, and the Structure of Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 1994;69(11):861-71.
- 12. Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2004;10(2):261-80.
- 13. Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada, Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en génie du Canada, Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada. Énoncé de politique des trois Conseils : Éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains. Ottawa: Groupe consultatif interagences en éthique de la recherche. 2010 Contract No.: MR21-18/2010F-PDF.
- 14. Halse C, Honey A. Rethinking Ethics Review as Institutional Discourse. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13(3):336-52.
- 15. Baarts C. Stuck in the middle: research ethics caught between science and politics. Qualitative Research. 2009;9(4):423-39.
- 16. Ben-Ari A, Enosh G. Power Relations and Reciprocity: Dialectics of Knowledge Construction. Qualitative Health Research. 2012;23(3):422-9.
- 17. Block K, Warr D, Gibbs L, Riggs E. Addressing Ethical and Methodological Challenges in Research with Refugee-background Young People: Reflections from the Field. Journal of Refugee Studies. 2012;26(1):69-87.
- 18. Boser S. Power, Ethics, and the IRB: Dissonance Over Human Participant Review of Participatory Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13(8):1060-74.
- 19. Tilley S, Gormley L. Canadian University Ethics Review: Cultural Complications Translating Principles Into Practice. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13(3):368-87.
- 20. Gelling L, Munn-Giddings C. Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics. 2011;7(3):100-6.
- 21. Association universitaire canadienne d’études nordiques (AUCEN). Principes d’éthique pour la conduite de la recherche dans le Nord. Ottawa: Association universitaire canadienne d’études nordiques. 2003.
- 22. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), Nunavut Research Institute (NRI). Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities. A Guide for Researchers. 2007.
- 23. Assemblée des Premières Nations du Québec et du Labrador. Protocole de recherche des Premières Nations du Québec et du Labrador. Wendake: Assemblée des Premières Nations du Québec et du Labrador. 2005.
- 24. Inuit Tuttarvingat of NAHO, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. Inuit-Specific Perspectives on Research and Research Ethics. In: National Aboriginal Health Organization (NAHO), Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK) editors. 2010.
- 25. Centre des Premières Nations. Analyse et modèles d’éthique en recherche. Ottawa: Organisation nationale de la santé autochtone (ONSA). 2007.