The Unique Role and Contribution of Peer Supporters to MAiD in Canada: Lessons Learned from a National Discussion Series

de Bie, Lee; Dunning, Allison; Theodorou, Allyson; Sinding, Christina; Hawke, Lisa

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1121338ar

1. PeerWorks. Frequently asked questions. PeerWorks; 2024.

Google Scholar

2. Starkman M. The movement. Phoenix Rising. 1981;2(3):2A-9A.

Google Scholar

3. Shimrat I. Call Me Crazy: Stories from the Mad Movement. Vancouver: Press Gang Publishers; 1997.

Google Scholar

4. Davies M. The inmates are running the asylum: Stories from the Mental Patients Association (MPA). History of Madness Productions. 16 Jan 2014.

Google Scholar

5. Weitz D. On our own: A self-help model. In: Lumsden DP, editor. Community Mental Health Action: Primary Prevention Programming. Ottawa: Canadian Public Health Association; 1984. p. 312-20.

Google Scholar

6. Boschma G, Devane C. The art of peer support: Work, health, consumer participation, and new forms of citizenship in late twentieth-century mental health care in British Columbia. BC Stud. 2019;(202):65-97.

Google Scholar

7. Trainor J, Shepherd M, Boydell KM, Leff A, Crawford E. Beyond the service paradigm: The impact and implications of consumer/survivor initiatives. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1997;21(2):132-40.

10.1037/h0095328 Google Scholar

8. de Bie L, Michetti-Wilson E. Drift from peer support values and standards: A position statement and call for action. PeerWorks; 2024.

Google Scholar

9. Stergiopoulos V, Bastidas-Bilbao H, Gupta M, et al. Care considerations in medical assistance in dying for persons with mental illness as the sole underlying medical condition: a qualitative study of patient and family perspectives. BMC Psychiatry. 2024;24:120.

10.1186/s12888-024-05541-5 Google Scholar

10. Baril A. Theorizing the intersections of ableism, sanism, ageism and suicidism in suicide and physician-assisted death debates. In: The Disability Bioethics Reader. New York: Routledge; 2022. p. 221-31.

10.4324/9781003289487-28 Google Scholar

11. Baril A. Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 2023.

10.2307/jj.5104041 Google Scholar

12. Procknow G. The necropolitics of psychiatric euthanasia and assisted suicide (pEAS). Can J Disabil Stud. 2024;13(1):50-86.

10.15353/cjds.v13i1.1076 Google Scholar

13. Cohen E. Testimonial of Ellen Cohen. Can J Disabil Stud. 2024;13(2):201-4.

10.15353/cjds.v13i2.1113 Google Scholar

14. Krausert S. Testimonial of Sean Krausert. Can J Disabil Stud. 2024;13(2):244-6.

10.15353/cjds.v13i2.1123 Google Scholar

15. Vrakas G. Testimonial of Georgia Vrakas. Can J Disabil Stud. 2024;13(2):304-11.

10.15353/cjds.v13i2.1134 Google Scholar

16. Empowerment Council. Mental health service users and medical assistance in dying (MAID). 2017.

Google Scholar

17. Our Voice / Notre Voix. Emergency edition: Saying NO to our euthanizing - Why Bill C-7 to extend medical assistance in dying to cases uniquely involving “mental illness” is WRONG!. Our Voice / Notre Voix; 2023;76.

Google Scholar

18. Walker TO. Bodily autonomy or state sanctioned death? Asylum Mag. 2024;31(3).

Google Scholar

19. Wedlake G. MAID and mental illness: An interview with Dr. Jeffrey Kirby. Mad in Canada: Science, Psychiatry and Social Justice. 5 Oct 2023.

Google Scholar

20. Peer Support Canada. Vision and mission. 2025.

Google Scholar

21. PeerWorks. About PeerWorks. 2024.

Google Scholar

22. de Bie L, Brown S, Dhadwal E, et al. Medical assistance in dying resources for peer supporters. PeerWorks and Peer Support Canada. Mar 2024.

Google Scholar

23. Editors of Phoenix Rising. Editorial: Coming together; making changes. Phoenix Rising. 1981;2(3):2-3.

Google Scholar

24. Peer Support Accreditation and Certification (Canada). National Certification Handbook. 2016.

Google Scholar

25. Peer Support Canada. Peer Support Core Values. 2019.

Google Scholar

26. National Association of Peer Supporters. National Practice Guidelines for Peer Supporters. 2013.

Google Scholar

27. Stratford AC, Halpin M, Phillips K, Skerritt F, Beales A, Cheng V, Davidson L. The growth of peer support: An international charter. J Ment Health. 2019;28(6):627-32.

10.1080/09638237.2017.1340593 Google Scholar

28. World Health Organization. One-to-one peer support by and for people with lived experience. Geneva: WHO; 2019.

Google Scholar

29. Campbell L. Kant, autonomy and bioethics. Ethics Med Public Health. 2017;3(3):381-92.

10.1016/j.jemep.2017.05.008 Google Scholar

30. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 18 Apr 1979.

Google Scholar

31. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 1^st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979.

Google Scholar

32. Moore KL. Disabled autonomy. J Health Care Law Policy. 2019;22(2):245-79.

Google Scholar

33. Chamberlin J. The ex-patients’ movement: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. J Mind Behav. 1990;11(3-4):323-36.

Google Scholar

34. Chamberlin J. On Our Own: Patient-Controlled Alternatives to the Mental Health System. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

Google Scholar

35. Dain N. Critics and dissenters: Reflections on anti-psychiatry in the United States. J Hist Behav Sci. 1989;25(1):3-25.

10.1002/1520-6696(198901)25:1<3::AID-JHBS2300250102>3.0.CO;2-G Google Scholar

36. McLean A. Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: Contradictions, crisis and change. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(8):1053-71.

10.1016/0277-9536(94)00179-W Google Scholar

37. O’Hagan M. Force in mental health services: International user and survivor perspectives. Ment Health Pract. 2004;7(5):12-7.

10.7748/mhp2004.02.7.5.12.c1787 Google Scholar

38. Rissmiller DJ, Rissmiller JH. Evolution of the antipsychiatry movement into mental health consumerism. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(6):863-6.

10.1176/ps.2006.57.6.863 Google Scholar

39. Survivors History Group. Survivors History Group takes a critical look at historians. In: Barnes M, Cotterell P, editors. Critical Perspectives on User Involvement. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2011. p. 7-18.

10.1332/policypress/9781847427519.003.0002 Google Scholar

40. Frazee C. MAID resistance in Canada: sounding the five-minute entreaty. Can J Disabil Stud. 2024;13(2):1-175.

10.15353/cjds.v13i2.1105 Google Scholar

41. Crepaz-Keay D, Cyhlarova E. Ethical issues in mental health peer support. In: Sadler JZ, Fulford KWM, van Staden W, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Psychiatric Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 244-54.

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732365.013.15 Google Scholar

42. Bennett H. Friendship. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2023 Edition.

Google Scholar

43. Onken SJ. Contextualizing self-determination within a mental health recovery oriented service and support system. In: Jonikas JA, Cook JA, editors. The National Self-Determination and Psychiatric Disability Invitational Conference. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago, National Research and Training Center; 2004. p. 96-128.

Google Scholar

44. Jozaghi E. The role of drug users’ advocacy group in changing the dynamics of life in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada. J Subst Use. 2014;19(1-2):213-8.

10.3109/14659891.2013.775608 Google Scholar

45. Zisman-Ilani Y, Hayes D, Fancourt D. Promoting social prescribing in psychiatry—using shared decision-making and peer support. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023;80(8):759-60.

10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0788 Google Scholar

46. Sinding C, Kumar K, Smith P, Ivanyi K. The ‘means available to relieve suffering’: Translating medical assistance in dying safeguards in Canadian policy and practice. Soc Policy Soc. 2025;1-14.

10.1017/S1474746424000629 Google Scholar

47. Sunderland K, Mishkin W, Peer Leadership Group, Mental Health Commission of Canada. Guidelines for the Practice and Training of Peer Support. Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada; 2013.

Google Scholar

48. Hardaker D. Self-determination and peer support. 2012.

Google Scholar

49. Boyce S. Helping your friends who sometimes wanna die maybe not die. Tiny Lanter; 2019.

Google Scholar

50. Davidow S, Mazel-Carlton C. The “alternatives to suicide” approach: A decade of lessons learned. In: Alternatives to Suicide. San Diego: Academic Press; 2020. p. 179-99.

10.1016/B978-0-12-814297-4.00009-1 Google Scholar

51. Myers AL, Mbao M, Kadakia A, Collings S, Fortuna KL. Experiences of community members engaged in eCPR (Emotional Connecting, Empowering, Revitalizing) training: Qualitative focus group study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(6):e32219.

10.2196/32219 Google Scholar

52. Spiro L, Swarbrick M. Peer-run respite approaches to supporting people experiencing an emotional crisis. Psychiatr Serv. 2024;75(11):1163-6.

10.1176/appi.ps.20230599 Google Scholar

53. Venner F, Noad M. A beacon of hope: Alternative approach to crisis — learning from Leeds Survivor Led Crisis Service. In: Coles S, Keenan S, Diamond B, editors. Madness Contested: Power and Practice. PCCS Books; 2013. p. 332-48.

Google Scholar

54. Ochocka J, Nelson G, Janzen R, Trainor J. A longitudinal study of mental health consumer/survivor initiatives: Part 3—A qualitative study of impacts of participation on new members. J Community Psychol. 2006;34(3):273-83.

10.1002/jcop.20099 Google Scholar

55. Health Canada. Fifth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada, 2023. Ottawa. 11 Dec 2024.

Google Scholar

56. Fruhstorfer C, Kelly M, Spiegel L, Baylis PJ, Dembo J, Wiebe E. Patient experiences with requests for medical assistance in dying: Perspectives of those with complex chronic conditions. Can Fam Physician. 2024;70(1):41-7.

10.46747/cfp.700141 Google Scholar

57. Baril A. The somatechnologies of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying Law: LGBTQ discourses on suicide and the injunction to live. Somatechnics. 2017;7(2):201-17.

10.3366/soma.2017.0218 Google Scholar

58. Howard M. Countering the rational suicide story. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2021;14(1):73-102.

10.3138/ijfab-14.1.04 Google Scholar

59. Reynolds V. Hate kills: A social justice response to “suicide”. In: White J, Marsh I, Kral MJ, Morris J, editors. Critical Suicidology: Transforming Suicide Research and Prevention for the 21st Century. UBC Press; 2016. p. 169-87.

10.59962/9780774830317-010 Google Scholar

60. Thom KC. I Hope We Choose Love: A Trans Girl’s Notes from the End of the World. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press; 2019.

Google Scholar

61. Baril A. Suicidism: A new theoretical framework to conceptualize suicide from an anti-oppressive perspective. Disabil Stud Q. 2020;40(3).

10.18061/dsq.v40i3.7053 Google Scholar

62. Huisman A, van Bergen DD. Peer specialists in suicide prevention: Possibilities and pitfalls. Psychol Serv. 2019;16(3):372-80.

10.1037/ser0000255 Google Scholar

63. Trans Lifeline. Why no nonconsensual active rescue? In: Dixon E, Piepzna-Samarasinha LL, editors. Beyond Survival: Strategies and Stories from the Transformative Justice Movement. AK Press; 2020. p. 80-2.

Google Scholar

64. Wedlake G. Complicating theory through practice: Affirming the right to die for suicidal people. Can J Disabil Stud. 2020;9(4):89-110.

10.15353/cjds.v9i4.670 Google Scholar

65. Davidow S. Suicidal tendencies, Part III: So, when do I get to call the cops? Mad in America. 8 Aug 2018.

Google Scholar

66. Kumbhare S. A reconceptualization of suicide and social workers’ duty to report. OMEGA. 2022;86(1):157-73.

10.1177/0030222820963773 Google Scholar

67. Fisher D. Emotional CPR: A way everyone can recover their life in the time of COVID. In: Chuck R, Maisel E, editors. Humane Alternatives to the Psychiatric Model. Ethics International Press; 2023. p. 179-92.

Google Scholar

68. van Bergen D, Henseler T. Peers specialists and mental health nurses who work with patients who are suicidal: A comparative interview study. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024;8:100285.

10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100285 Google Scholar

69. Roennfeldt H, Hamilton BE, Hill N, et al. Our wished ‐for responses: Recommendations for creating a lived and embodied sense of safety during mental health crisis. Health Expect. 2024;27(3):e14122.

10.1111/hex.14122 Google Scholar

70. Roennfeldt H, Glover H, Castles C, et al. We can do better: Recommendations for mental health crisis care from people with lived experience. Emerg Med Australas. 2025;37(1):e14528.

10.1111/1742-6723.14528 Google Scholar

71. Kammeraat M, van Rooijen G, Kuijper L, Kiverstein JD, Denys DA. Patients requesting and receiving euthanasia for psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands. BMJ Ment Health. 2023;26(1):e300729.

10.1136/bmjment-2023-300729 Google Scholar

72. American Association of Suicidology. Statement of the American Association of Suicidology: “Suicide” is Not the Same as “Physician Aid in Dying”. 30 Oct 2017.

Google Scholar

73. Hawke LD, Bastidas-Bilbao H, Cappe V, et al. Medical assistance in dying for mental illness as a sole underlying medical condition and its relationship to suicide: A qualitative lived experience-engaged study. Can J Psychiatry. 2024;69(5):314-25.