Abstracts
Abstract
Emotions often lead to akrasia and practical irrationality but can also help us respond to our practical reasons for action. If we think there exists an important distinction between akrasia and weakness of will, how should we then rethink emotions’ contribution and threats to practical rationality? By drawing on recent work on willpower, I invite Tappolet to consider this question.
Résumé
Les émotions conduisent souvent à l’akrasie et à l’irrationalité pratique, mais elles peuvent aussi nous aider à répondre à nos raisons pratiques d’agir. Si nous pensons qu’il existe une distinction importante entre l’akrasie et la faiblesse de la volonté, comment devrions-nous alors repenser la contribution des émotions et les menaces qu’elles représentent pour la rationalité pratique ? En m’appuyant sur des travaux récents sur la volonté, j’invite Tappolet à réfléchir à cette question.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Arpaly, Nomy, “On Acting Rationally against One’s Best Judgment,” Ethics, vol. 110, no. 3, 2000, pp. 488-513.
- Arpaly, Nomy, and Timothy Schroeder, “Praise, Blame and the Whole Self.” Philosophical Studies, vol. 93, no. 2, 1999, pp. 161-188.
- Bennett, Jonathan, “The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn,” Philosophy, vol. 49, no. 188, 1974, pp. 123-134.
- Chislenko, Eugene, “Virtues of Willpower,” Synthese, vol. 202, art. 143, 2023, pp. 1-21.
- Holton, Richard, Willing, Wanting, Waiting, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2009.
- Paul, Sarah K., “Willing, Wanting, Waiting, by Richard Holton,” Mind, vol. 120, no. 479, 2011, pp. 889-892.
- Stroud, Sarah, and Larisa Svirsky, “Weakness of Will,” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2021. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/weakness-will/
- Tappolet, Christine, Philosophy of Emotion: A Contemporary Introduction, New York, Routledge, 2023.
- Tenenbaum, Sergio, Appearances of the Good: An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
- Watson, Gary, “Skepticism About Weakness of Will,” Philosophical Review, vol. 86, no. 3, 1977, pp. 316-339.