Abstracts
Abstract
This paper presents a conception of corruption informed by epistemic democratic theory. I first explain the view of corruption as a disease of the political body. Following this view, we have to consider the type of actions that debase a political entity of its constitutive principal in order to assess corruption. Accordingly, we need to consider what the constitutive principle of democracy is. This is the task I undertake in the second section where I explicate democratic legitimacy. I present democracy as a procedure of social inquiry about what ought to be done that includes epistemic and practical considerations. In the third section, I argue that the problem of corruption for a procedural conception of democracy is that the epistemic value of the procedure is diminished by corrupted agents’ lack of concern for truth. Corruption, according to this view, consists in two deformities of truth: lying and bullshit. These deformities corrupt since they conceal private interests under the guise of a concern for truth. In the fourth section, I discuss the difficulties a procedural account may face in formulating solutions to the problem of corruption.
Résumé
Cet article offre une approche du concept de corruption en fonction d’une théorie épistémique de la démocratie. J’explique d’abord l’idée de la corruption en tant que maladie du corps politique. Suivant cette approche, concevoir la corruption politique requiert de déterminer quel type d’action détourne une entité politique de son principe constitutif. Ainsi, il convient d’établir quel est le principe constitutif de la démocratie. C’est ce que je fais dans la seconde section où j’explique la légitimité démocratique. Je présente la démocratie comme une entreprise commune d’enquête, qui inclut à la fois des considérations épistémiques et pratiques, sur ce qui devrait être fait. Dans la troisième section, j’argumente que le problème de la corruption pour une justification procédurale de la démocratie est que la valeur épistémique de la procédure est amoindrie par le manque de considération d’agents corrompus pour la vérité. La corruption, selon ce cadre d’analyse, consiste en deux difformités de la vérité : le mensonge et la bullshit. Ces difformités cor-rompent du fait qu’elles dissimulent une recherche d’intérêts particuliers sous le couvert d’un intérêt pour une décision correcte. Dans la quatrième section, je discute des difficultés de l’approche procédurale à formuler des solutions au problème de la corruption.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Allard-Tremblay, Yann, Epistemic Theories of Democracy, Constitutionalism and the Procedural Legitimacy of Fundamental Rights, St Andrews, PhD Thesis University of St Andrews, 2012.
- Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
- Babbitt, Paul, “Bullshit, Politics, and the Democratic Power of Satire,” APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2301256
- Besson, Samantha, The Morality of Conflict; Reasonable Disagreement and the Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005.
- Christiano, Thomas, The Constitution of Equality, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.
- Coady, C. A. J., Messy Morality; The Challenge of Politics, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2008.
- Coady, David., What to Believe Now; Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
- Delannoi, Gil, Dowlen, Oliver and Peter Stone, The Lottery as a Democratic Institution, Policy Institute, Dublin, University of Dublin Trinity College, 2013.
- Estlund, David, Democratic Authority; A Philosophical Framework, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008.
- Euben, J. Peter, “Corruption,” in Terence Ball, James Farr, & Russel L. Hanson (eds), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 220-246.
- Frankfurt, Harry. G., On Bullshit, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2005.
- Fricker, Miranda, Epistemic Injustice; Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.
- Johnston, Michael, “Public Officials, Private Interests, and Sustainable Democracy: When Politics and Corruption Meet,” in Kimberly A. Elliott (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy, Washington, Institute for International Economics, 1997, p. 61-82.
- Knight, Jack and John Johnson, The Priority of Democracy; Political Consequences of Pragmatism, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2011.
- Misak, C. J., Truth, Politics, Morality; Pragmatism and Deliberation, London, Routledge, 2000.
- Misak, C. J., “Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 18, no. 1, 2004, p. 9-22.
- Misak, C. J., “Pragmatism on Solidarity, Bullshit, and other Deformities of Truth,” Midwest Studies In Philosophy,vol. 32, no. 1, 2008, p. 111-121.
- Ober, Josiah, Democracy and Knowledge; Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2008.
- Peirce, Charles S., “The Fixation of Belief,” Popular Science Monthly, no. 12, 1877, p. 1-15.
- Peter, Fabienne, Democratic Legitimacy, New York, Routledge, 2009.
- Raz, Joseph, “Human Rights Without Foundations,” in Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 321-337.
- Rose-Ackerman, Susan, “The Political Economy of Corruption,”in Kimberly. A. Elliott (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy, Washington, Institute for International Economics, 1997, p. 31-60.
- Talisse, Robert, Democracy and Moral Conflict, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
- Thompson, Dennis F, “Mediated Corruption: The Case of the Keating Five,” The American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 2, 1993, p. 369-381.
- Waldron, Jeremy, “Deliberation, Disagreement, and Voting,”in Harold H. Koh and Ronald C. Slye (eds), Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights, London, Yale University Press, 1999a, p. 210-226.
- Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999b.
- Warren, Mark E., “What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 48, no. 2, 2004, p. 328-343.
- Warren, Mark E, “Political Corruption as Duplicitous Exclusion,” PS: Political science and politics, vol. 37, no. 4, 2006, p. 803-807.
- Warren, Mark E., “The Meaning of Corruption in Democracies” in Paul Heywood (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption, New York, Routledge, forthcoming, p. 1-29.
- Westbrook, Robert B., Democratic Hope; Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth, London, Cornell University Press, 2005.