ror.org/0420zvk78
Abstracts
Résumé
L’influence de la subjectivité sur les processus de sélection en matière de numérisation n’a pas encore été étudiée en profondeur. La présente étude traite des facteurs subjectifs qui sous-tendent les choix des professionnels engagés dans des projets de numérisation ; entreprend une réflexion sur la manière dont ils prennent des décisions de sélection et examine dans quelle mesure leurs points de vue influencent les sélections. Des entrevues menées auprès de cinq professionnels des bibliothèques ou centres d’archives révèlent six facteurs subjectifs récurrents. La documentation de l’influence de ces facteurs apporte davantage de clarté, offrant une meilleure compréhension des objets numériques.
Abstract
The influence of subjectivity on the process of selection of documents for digitization has not been studied in depth. The present study discusses subjective factors which underlie the choices of professionals engaged in digitization projects; it also offers a reflection on the way they make decisions related to selection and examines to what extent their personal viewpoints influence the process of selection. Interviews with five library and archives professionals reveal six recurring subjective factors. Documentation of the influence of these factors offers clarity and great understanding of digitized objects.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- ANDERSON, C. (2006). Ethical Decision Making for Libraries. Oxford, Royaume-Unis : Chandos Publishing Ltd.
- ASSOCIATION FOR LIBRARY COLLECTIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES, PRESERVATION AND REFORMATTING SECTION. (Juin 2007). Definitions of Digital Preservation. Washington, D.C. : Conférence de la American Library Association.
- BAILLARGEON, S. (2014). La mémoire de l’art. Le Devoir, 8 octobre, édition finale.
- BÜLOW, A., AHMON, J. et SPENCER, R. (2011). Preparing Collections for Digitization. Londres, Royaume-Unis : Facet Publishing, en association avec les National Archives.
- COLE, R. et HACKETT, C. (2010). Search vs. Research : Full-text Repositories, Granularity, and the Concept of « Source » in the Digital Environment. Dans C. Avery et M. Holmlund Better off Forgetting?: Essays on Archives, Public Policy, and Collective Memory. Toronto, Ontario : University of Toronto Press.
- CONSEIL CANADIEN DES ARCHIVES. (2002). Digitization and Archives. Repéré le 3 avril 2013, à http://www.cdncouncilarchives.ca/digitization_en.pdf.
- CONSEIL CANADIEN DES ARCHIVES. (2002). Numérisation et archives. Repéré le 25 novembre 2016, à http://www.cdncouncilarchives.ca/digitization_fr.pdf.
- CONWAY, P. (2010). Preservation in the Age of Google : Digitization, Digital Preservation, and Dilemmas. Library Quarterly 80(1), 61-79.
- COOK, T. (2001). Archival Science and Postmodernism : New Formulations for Old Concepts. Archival Science. 1(1), 3-24.
- FRESKO, M. et TOMBS, K. (1998). Digital Preservation Guidelines : the State of the Art in Libraries, Museums and Archives. Luxembourg : European Commission, Directorate General XIII/E4. Repéré le 28 mai 2014, à ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/ist/docs/digicult/study1.doc.
- GERTZ, J. (2000). Selection for Preservation in the Digital Age. Library Resources & Technical Services44(2), 97-109.
- HAMPSHIRE, E. et JOHNSON, V. (2009). The Digital World and the Future of Historical Research 1. Twentieth Century British History. 20(3), 396-414.
- HARRIS, V. (2002). The Archival Sliver : Power, Memory, and Archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2(1-2), 63-86.
- HAZEN, D., HORREL, J. et MERRILL-OLDHAM, J. (1998). Selecting Research Collections for Digitization. Washington, D. C. : Council on Library and Information. Repéré le 14 septembre 2014, à http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/hazen/pub74.html/pub74.html#intellectual.
- HUGHES, L. M. (2004). Digitizing Collections : Strategic Issues for the Information Manager. Londres, Royaume-Unis : Facet.
- JENKINSON, H. (1922). A Manual of Archive Administration Including the Problems of War Archives and Archive Making. Oxford , Royaume-Unis : The Clarendon Press.
- JONES, M. et BEAGRIE, N. (2001). Preservation Management of Digital Materials : a Handbook. Londres, Royaume-Unis : The British Library for Resource, the Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries.
- MCELRATH, D. P. (2005). Why We Collect : Curators, Collectors, and the Urge to Acquire. Dans Y. Carignan Who Wants Yesterday’s Papers?: Essays on the Research Value of Printed Materials in the Digital Age. Maryland : Scarecrow Press.
- MCILWAINE, J., COMMENT, J.-M., DE WOLF, C., PETERS, D., JUSTRELL, B., VARLAMOFF, M.-T. et KOOPMAN, S. (2002). Guidelines for Digitization Projects for Collections and Holdings in the Public Domain, Particularly those Held by Libraries and Archives. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/preservation-and-conservation/publications/digitization-projects-guidelines.pdf
- MOSS, M. (2005). The NINCH Guide to Good Practice in the Digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Materials : Technical Guidelines for Digital Cultural Content Creation Programs. American Archivist. 68(1), 40.
- RÉSEAU CANADIEN D’INFORMATION SUR LE PATRIMOINE. (2000). Guide à l’intention des gestionnaires chargés de la planification et de la mise en oeuvre de projets d’informatisation. Repéré le 25 novembre 2016. http://canada.pch.gc.ca/fra/1447160408221/1447164205893
- ROOSA, M. (2005). Some Thoughts on the Race Against Time and Inherent Vice : Library Preservation in the Late Twentieth Century. Dans Y. Carignan, Who Wants Yesterday’s Papers?: Essays on the Research Value of Printed Materials in the Digital Age. Maryland : Scarecrow Press.
- SCHWARTZ, J. M. et COOK, T. 2002. Archives, Records, and Power : the Making of Modern Memory. Archival Science. 2(1–2), 1-19.
- SITTS, M. K. (2000). Handbook for Digital Projects : a Management Tool for Preservation and Access. Andover, MA : Northeast Document Conservation Center.
- SMITH, A. (1999). Why Digitize? Council on Library and Information Resources. Repéré le 29 novembre 2016, http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub80-smith/pub80.html#access
- STERNFELD, J. (2011). Archival Theory and Digital Historiography : Selection, Search, and Metadata as Archival Processes for Assessing Historical Contextualization. American Archivist, 74(2), 544-575.
- STILL IMAGE WORKING GROUP. (2009). Digitization Activities Project Planning and Management Outline. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Repéré le 13 mai 2014, http://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/guidelines/DigActivities-FADGI-v1-20091104.pdf
- UNITED KINGDOM. PARLIAMENTARY ARCHIVES. (2008). Digitisation Guidelines. Repéré le 28 mai 2014, à http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/digitisation-guidelines.pdf
- UNITED KINGDOM. THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES. (2009). Corporate Preservation Policy. [Richmond] : 3–4. Repéré le 28 mai 2014, à https://web.archive.org/web/20111027080106/http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/tna-corporate-preservation-policy-2009-website-version.pdf
- VOGT-O’CONNOR, D. (2000). Selection of Materials for Scanning. Dans Maxine K. Sitts Handbook for Digital Projects : a Management Tool for Preservation and Access. Massachusetts : Northeast Document Conservation Center.
- ZHANG, A. B., et GOURLEY, D. (2008). Creating Digital Collections : a Practical Guide. Oxford, Royaume Unis : Chandos Pub.